效果与反思:量刑证据运用机制实证研究——以北大法宝盗窃案件判决书为样本

Effect and Reflection:An Empirical Research of the Sentencing Evidence Using Mechanism——Taking the Theft Case Court Verdict in the Pkulaw as Sample

以法院判决书为样本的实证考察,可以大致勾勒出盗窃案件量刑证据运用的图像:第一,多酌定要素,少法定要素;第二,重行为人品行、犯罪后果与犯罪后的态度等量刑要素,轻犯罪动机与目的、犯罪手段、生活状况等量刑要素;第三,多强调职权认定效果,少端赖对抗式庭审程序;第四,辩护律师提出的量刑证据得到法院一定的认可,但判决书的量刑说理尚不充分。未来量刑证据运用机制可能的建设方案是侧重扩大控辩双方参与量刑的机会,允许双方在庭审外书面提供更多的量刑信息,尤其重视律师提出的量刑证据,同时增强判决书的量刑说理。

Using the empirical investigation of court verdict as study sample, we can roughly draw the images of using sentencing evidence on theft cases： first, there are more discretionary elements and less legal ele- ments; second, more importance can be attached to the behavior valuing, consequence and attitude after committing the crime, and less to the crime motive and objective, criminal means and living condition; third, more emphasis can be laid on effects of using powers to verify, and less on depending on the adversarial trial proce- dures ; fourth, sentencing evidence provided by defense lawyers can be partly adopted by the courts, but reason- ing on sentencing may not be enough. The constructive scheme of using sentencing evidence mechanism in the future can increase the chances for the prosecutor and the defense in sentencing, allowing two parties to provide more sentencing evidence by written documents. In this Way, particular emphasis will be lad on sentencing evidence put forward by the lawyer and enhance sentencing reasoning.