期刊文献+

自复位摇晃式支座运用于建筑隔震之可行性研究

Application of self-centering rocking bearings in vibration isolation of buildings
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用摇晃(Rocking)及滚动(Rolling)机制研发了一种新型隔震支座,称作自复位摇晃式隔震支座(Self-centering Rocking Bearing,简称SCRB),根据该支座力与位移关系,建立了以其作为隔震组件之隔震建筑理论运动模型;并以其滚动曲面半径、高宽比(Aspect Ratio)及上部结构自振周期作为研究参数,对SCRB隔震结构受自由振动、简谐力、地震地表加速度扰动进行数值分析。结果显示,经适当设计之SCRB隔震结构不具固定振动周期,不会被特定之扰动频率锁定而引发共振;在受大地震时,能有效降低上部结构之加速度反应,亦能减少层间变位(Drift),可用于建筑隔震。 Here, a new type of vibration isolation bearing referred to as self-centering rocking bearing (SCRB) was presented, rocking and rolling mechanism were applied to develop it. A theoretical model for a isolated structure equipped with this bearing was constructed to simulate the relation between force and displacement under excitations. Diameter of rolling surface, aspect ratio and natural frequencies of the superstructure were taken as parameters to be studied. Numerical analysis was performed to investigate the responses of the structure under free vibration and excitations of harmonic load and the ground acceleration of earthquake. The results indicated that the appropriately designed structure with SCRB does not have fixed natural frequencies, and no resonances happen under any particular disturbance frequency ; under the strong earthquake the acceleration response of its superstructure and the drift between its storeys can be reduced effectively; so, the self-centering rocking bearings can be used in vibration isolation of buildings.
出处 《振动与冲击》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第8期68-78,共11页 Journal of Vibration and Shock
基金 台湾行政院国家科学委员会受震自复位结构之研究-子计划:摇摆隔震元件之研发(I)计划补助(NSC100-2625-M-327-002)
关键词 自复位 摇晃 滚动 隔震支座 self-centering rocking rolling vibration isolation bearing
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Housner G W. The behavior of Inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes [J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1963, 53(2) :403 -417.
  • 2Beck J L, Skinner R I. The seismic response of a reinforced concrete bridge pier designed to step [ J ]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1974,2:343 - 358.
  • 3Yim C S, Chopra A K, Penzien J. Rocking response of rigid blocks to earthquakes [ J ]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1980, 8:565 - 587.
  • 4Chopra A K, Yim C S. Simplified earthquake analysis of structures with foundation uplift [ J ]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1985, 111 (4) :906 - 930.
  • 5Psycharis M J N. Effect of base uplift on dynamic response of SDOF structures [ J ]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1991, 117(3) :733 -754.
  • 6Mander J B, Cheng C T. Seismic resistance of bridge piers based on damage avoidance design [ R ]. Technical Report NCEER 97-0014, Buffalo, NY: NCREE, 1997.
  • 7Cheng C T. New paradigms for the seismic design and retrofit of the bridge piers [ D ]. Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo, 1997.
  • 8Kung C C. Vibration reducing of bridge with rocking piers [ D ]. Hsihchu : National Chiao Tung University, 1999.
  • 9Mashiko N. Comparative performance of ductile and damage protected bridge piers subjected to bi-direction earthquake attack [ D]. Christchurch: University of Canterbury, 2006.
  • 10Hamid N H. Seismic damage avoidance design of warehouse buildings constructed using precast hollow core panels [ D ]. Christchurch : University of Canterbury, 2006.

二级参考文献38

  • 1FEMA 273 NEHRP guidelines and commentary for seismic rehabilitation of buildings [ S ]. Washington DC, USA: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1997.
  • 2FEMA 356 Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings[ S]. Washington DC, USA: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000.
  • 3FEMA 445 Next-generation performance-based seismic design guidelines: program plan for new and existing buildings [ S]. Washington DC, USA : Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2007.
  • 4Report of the seventh joint planning meeting of NEES/ E-defense collaborative research on earthquake engineering[ R]. PEER 2010/109. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, 2010.
  • 5Roh H. Seismic behavior of structures using rocking columns and viscous dampers [ D ]. Buffalo : University at Buffalo, The State University of New York. Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, 2007.
  • 6Housner G W. The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes [ J ]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1963, 53 (2) : 403- 417.
  • 7Hukelbridge A A, Clough R W. Preliminary experimental study of seismic uplift of a steel frame [ R ]. Report No. UCB/EERC-77/22. Berkely: University of California, Berkely, 1977.
  • 8Hukelbridge A A. Earthquake simulation tests of a nine story steel frame with columns allowed to uplift [ R ]. Report No. UCB/EERC-77/23. Berkely: University of California, Berkely, 1977.
  • 9Priestley M J N, Evison R J, Carr A J. Seismic response of structures free to rock on their foundations [ J ]. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 1978, 11 (3) : 141-150.
  • 10Makris N, Konstantinidis D. The rocking spectrum and the shortcomings of design guidelines [ R ]. Report No. PEER-01/07. Bekeley : University of California, Berkeley. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, 2001.

共引文献225

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部