摘要
目的:观察疏密波电针治疗紧张型头痛临床治疗效果,比较疏密波电针和连续波电针治疗紧张型头痛之间的疗效差异。方法:84例紧张型头痛患者随机分为疏密波电针组46例和连续波电针组38例,两组取穴为阿是穴、完骨、风池、天柱、率骨、太阳、百会、印堂、上星、四神聪、合谷、内关及太冲穴,疏密波电针组电针时采用疏密波,而连续波电针组电针时采用连续波。观察两种治疗方法的临床疗效和对头痛强度的影响。结果:疏密波电针组46例患者,临床痊愈32例,好转13例,无效1例,总有效率97.8%,连续波电针组38例,临床痊愈18例,好转14例,无效6例,总有效率84.2%,两组总有效率比较存在明显差异(P<0.05);在治疗2周期后,两种治疗方法能有效地降低患者头痛强度(P<0.01),但疏密波电针组明显优于连续波电针组(P<0.01)。结论:疏密波电针疗法能明显缓解紧张型头痛患者头痛症状和头痛强度,其效果优于连续波电针法。
Objective :To Compare the therapeutic effects of electroacupuncture with dilatational wave and elec- troacupuncture with continuous wave on tension - type headache. Methods: Eighty - four cases of tension - type headache were randomly divided into electroacupuncture with dilatational wave group and electroacupuncture with continuous wave group. Ashi acupoint, Wangu ( GB12 ), Fengchi ( GB20 ), Tianzhu ( BL10 ), Shuaigu ( GB8 ), Taiyang ( EX - HN 5 ), Baihui ( DU20 ), Yintang ( EX - HN 3 ), Shangxing ( DU23 ), Sishengcong ( EX - HN1 ) ,Hegu( LI4 ), Neiguan ( PC6 ) and Taichong ( LR3 ) were selected. Electroacupuncture with dilatational wave group ( n = 46 ) adopted dilatational wave, while electroacupuncture with continuous wave group ( n = 38 ) a- dopted continuous wave. Results:The total effective rate of electroacupuncture with dilatational wave was signifi- cantly increased compared with electroacupuncture with continuous wave group ( P 〈 0.05 ), and the degree of headache relief of electroacupuncture with dilatational wave was more than electroacupuncture with continuous wave group(P 〈0.01 ). Conclusion:Electroacupuncture with dilatational wave increases the total effective rate and decreases the degree of headache. The therapeutic effect of electroacupuncture with dilatation-a] wave is bet- tcr than that of electroacupuncture with continuous wave.
出处
《针灸临床杂志》
2013年第3期46-48,共3页
Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion
关键词
疏密波
连续波
电针疗法
紧张型头痛
Dilatational wave
Continuous wave
Electroacupuncture
Tension - type headache