期刊文献+

内镜取石术后胆总管结石复发因素分析 被引量:40

Risk factors for recurrent common bile duct stones after ERCP
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨经内镜逆行胰胆管术(ERCP)取石后胆总管结石复发的相关危险因素。方法对2009年ERCP取石的患者,随访观察术后胆总管结石复发情况。对比复发与未复发患者的性别、年龄、体重指数、初次病程、胆道手术史、胆囊结石、乳头旁憩室、胆总管直径、结石数量、结石大小、胆道狭窄11个相关因素,并对各相关因素行多因素Logistic回归分析,筛选出ERCP术后胆总管结石复发的主要危险因素。结果共成功随访190例患者,随访时间平均2.3年,结果胆总管结石复发68例,未复发122例。对比分析显示,胆总管结石复发组与未复发组的患者年龄[(65.5±15.5)岁比(57.6±15.4)岁,P=0.001],初次病程(P=0.015),胆道手术史(17.6%比2.5%,P=0.000),憩室(29.4%比7.4%,P=0.000),胆总管直径[(15.0±5.1)mm比(10.7±3.4)mm,P:0.001],胆道狭窄(32.3%比13.9%,P=0.000),结石数量≥2(80.9%比72.9%,P=0.000),结石直径≥10mm(35.3%比8.2%,P=0.000)为结石复发的危险因素。多因素分析显示,患者高龄(OR=3.44,95%CI:1.55—7.63,P=0.002),有胆道手术史(OR=5.82,95%CI:1.34~25.29,P=0.019),合并乳头旁憩室(OR=3.29,95%CI:1.18—9.12,P=0.022),胆总管直径≥10mm(OR=4.30,95%CI:1.72—10.72,P=0.002),结石数量≥2(OR=4.24,95%CI:1.61~11.16,P=0.003)为胆总管结石复发的独立危险因素。结论高龄、有胆道手术史、合并乳头旁憩室、胆总管直径≥10min、结石数量I〉2为胆总管结石复发的独立危险因素。 Objective To reveal the related risk factors of recurrent common bile duct (CBD) stones after ERCP. Methods Collected the patients data who underwent ERCP from January 2009 to December 2009 for CBD stones. The factors including gender, age, body mass index (BMI) , initial course of disease, history of biliary tract surgery, gallstones, papillary diverticulum, diameter of CBD, number of stones, size of stone and biliary stricture were compared between patients with recurrent CBD stone (recurrent group) or without (control group) by comparative analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 190 patients were followed up with a mean duration of 2. 3 years, with 68 patients in recurrent group and 122 in control. The comparative analysis showed that age ( 65.5 ± 15.5 yr vs. 57.6 ± 15.4 yr,P = 0. 001 ) , initial course of disease ( P = 0. 015 ) , history of biliary tract surgery ( 17.6% vs. 2. 5% ,P = 0. 000 ), papillary diverticulum ( 29.4% vs. 7. 4%, P = 0. 000 ), diameter of CBD ( 15.0 ± 5.1 mm vs. 10.7 ±3.4 mm,P =0. 001 ) , number of stones≥2 (80. 9% vs. 72. 9% ,P =0. 000) , diameter ofstone≥10 mm (35.3% vs. 8.2%,P=0.000) and biliary stricture (32.3% vs. 13.9%, P=0. 000) were statistically different between 2 groups. Multivariate analysis showed an older age ( OR = 3.44,95% CI: 1.55-7.63,P = 0. 002) , previous biliary surgery (OR = 5.82,95 % CI:I. 34-25.29,P = 0. 019) , having papillary diverticulum ( OR = 3.29,95 % CI: 1.18-9. 12, P = 0. 022 ), diameter of CBD ≥ 10 mm( OR = 4. 30, 95 % CI: 1.72-10. 72, P = 0. 002 ) , number of stones ≥ 2 ( OR = 4. 24,95 % CI: 1.61-11.16, P = 0. 003 ) are independent risk factors for recurrence of CBD stones. Conclusion An older age, previous biliary surgery history, papillary diverticulum, diameter of CBD ≥ 10 mm and number of stones ≥ 2 are independent risk factors for recurrence of CBD stones.
出处 《中华消化内镜杂志》 2013年第4期197-201,共5页 Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
关键词 胰胆管造影术 内窥镜逆行 胆总管结石 复发 危险因素 对比研究 Cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic retrograde Choledocholithiasis Recur-rence Risk factors Comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Kim DI,Kim MH, Lee SK,et al. Risk factors for recurrence ofprimary bile duct stones after endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.Gastrointest Endosc, 2001,54:4248.
  • 2Pereira-Lima JC,Jakobs R,Winter UH,et al. Long-term results(7 to 10 years) of endoscopic papillotomy forcholedocholithiasis.Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for therecurrence of bili-ary symptoms. Gastrointest Endosc,1998,48:457-464.
  • 3Sugiyama M, Atomi Y. Risk factors predictive of late complica-tions after endoscopic sphincterotomy forbile duct stones : long-term (more than 10 years) follow-up study. Am J Gastroenterol,2002,97:2763-2767.
  • 4Wojtun S, Gil J, Gietka W, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomyfor choledocholithiasis : a prospective single-centerstudy on theshort-term and long-term treatment results in 483 patients.Endoscopy,1997,29:258 -265.
  • 5Fritz E, Kirchgatterer A, Hubner D, et al. ERCP is safe and ef-fective in patients 80 years of age and older compared withyoungerpatients. Gastrointest Endosc,2006,64:899-905.
  • 6Agrawal D,Chak A. Peroral direct cholangioscopy for recurrentbile duct stones, using an ultrathin upper endoscope. Endoscopy,2010,42 Suppl2:E190-191.
  • 7Baek YH, Kira HJ, Park JH, et al. Risk factors for recurrentbile duct stones after endoscopic clearance of commonbile ductstones. Korean J Gastroenterol, 2009,54 :36-41.
  • 8Bergman JJ, der Mey S v, Rauws EA, et al. Long-term follow-up after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones inpatientsyounger than 60 years of age. Gastrointest Endosc, 1996, 44 :643-649.
  • 9Ramirez GJ. Factors related to therapeutic failure in the extrac-tion of bile duel stones forendoscopic retrograde colangiopancre-atography ERCP. Rev Gastroenterol Peru, 2011,31:330-334.
  • 10Yi SY. Recurrence of biliary symptoms after endoscopic sphincte-rotomy for choledocholithiasis in patients with gall bladder stones.J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2000,15 :661-664.

共引文献3

同被引文献255

引证文献40

二级引证文献251

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部