期刊文献+

高速涡轮钻在下颌阻生齿拔除术中的应用 被引量:7

下载PDF
导出
摘要 拔牙术是口腔治疗中最古老、最常见的手术,长期以来已形成一套传统的拔牙器械和方法。但传统的拔牙器械常常需要用锤敲击辅助用力,来达到增隙拔牙的目的;由于震动性大,给病人造成极大地心理恐惧,并且常引发周边软、硬组织损伤及颞下颌关节脱位等并发症,术后反应较重,引起疼痛、肿胀、张口受限及颞颌关节痛。近几年来随着社会的发展,患者对治疗质量要求越来越高,微创技术的不断发展,辅用高速涡轮牙钻日渐受到国内学者的重视[1]。为临床上提供了一种安全、快捷的拔牙方法。我科采用高速涡轮机去冠法拔除下颌阻生齿,取得满意效,现报告如下。
作者 吴颂
出处 《口腔医学研究》 CAS CSCD 2013年第4期373-374,共2页 Journal of Oral Science Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献12

  • 1张雪洋,胡飞,朱安棣,余燕玲.Luxator微创拔牙刀的临床研究[J].国际医药卫生导报,2007,13(2):20-22. 被引量:22
  • 2邱蔚六.口腔颌面外科学(第4版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000.460.
  • 3Levitt D. Atraumatic extraction and root retrieval using the periotome: a precursor to immediate placement of dental implants[J]. Dent Today,2001,20 (11):53-57.
  • 4Erten H, Akarslan ZZ, Bodrumlu E. Dental fear and anxiety levels of patients attending a dental clinic [J]. Quintessence Int, 2006,37(4):304-310.
  • 5Buchanan H, Niven N. Further evidence for the validity of the Facial Image Scale[J]. Int J Paediatr Dent, 2003,13(5): 368-369.
  • 6Casap N, Alterman M, Sharon G, et al. The effect of informed consent on stress levels associated with extraction of impacted mandibular third molars[J]. J Oral Maxiilofac Surg, 2008,66(5):878-881.
  • 7Akadiri OA, Obiechina AE. Assessment of difficulty in third molar surgery --a systematic review[J]. J Oral Maxiilofae Surg, 2009,67(4):771-774.
  • 8Shoben EJ Jr, Borland L. An empirical study of the etiogy of dental fears[J]. J Clin Psychol, 1954,10(2):171-174.
  • 9de Jongh A, Olff M, van Hoolwerf H, et al. Anxiety and post-traumatic stress symptoms following wisdom tooth removal[J]. Behav Res Ther, 2008,46(12):1305-1310.
  • 10Voegelin TC. Suter VG, Bomstein MM. Complications during and after surgical removal of mamdibular third molars. Impact of patient related and anatomical factors [J]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed,2008,118(3): 192-198.

共引文献37

同被引文献62

  • 1李薇,曾宪涛,沈正海,龙丹玲,黄志珍,冷卫东.中药预防第三磨牙拔除术后干槽症效果的Meta分析[J].湖北医药学院学报,2011,30(4):402-409. 被引量:5
  • 2赵德民,姜桂喜,于沛林.消炎抗菌可溶止血纱布临床验证分析[J].医药世界,2006(1):57-58. 被引量:2
  • 3罗杰,冷卫东.系统评价/Meta分析理论与实践[M].北京:军事医学科学出版社,2013.
  • 4Flick W G. The third molar controversy., framing the contro- versy as a public health policy issue[J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1999,57(4) :438- 445.
  • 5Eshghpour M, Nejat A H. Dry socket following surgical re- moval of impacted third molar in an Iranian population., inci- dence and risk factors[J]. Niger J Clin Praet,2013,16(4) :496- 500.
  • 6Kumar B S, Sarumathi T, Veerabahu M, et al. To compare standard incision and comma shaped incision and its influence on post-operative complications in surgical removal of impacted third molars[J]. J Clin Diagn Res,2013,7(7) : 1514-1518.
  • 7Clauser B, Barone R, Briccoli L, et al. Complications in surgical removal of mandibular third molars[J]. Minerva Stomatol, 2009,58(7/8) : 359-366.
  • 8Ogini F O, Ugboko V I, Assam E, et al. Postoperative com- plaints following impacted mandibular third molar surgery in Ile-Ife, Nigeria[J]. South Aft Dent J, 2002,57 (7) : 264-268.
  • 9Warraich R, Faisal M, Rana M, et al. Evaluation of postopera- tive discomfort following third molar surgery using submuco- sal dexamethasone, a randomized observer blind prospective study[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2013, 116(1) ,16-22.
  • 10Blondeau F, Daniel N G. Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: postoperative complications and their risk factors[J]. J Can Dent Assoc,2007,73(4) :325.

引证文献7

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部