期刊文献+

飞秒激光小切口基质透镜取出术和飞秒激光基质透镜取出术后早期角膜知觉变化的对比研究 被引量:19

Early outcomes of corneal sensitivity changes after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond lenticule extraction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评估和对比飞秒激光小切口基质透镜取出术(SMILE)和飞秒激光基质透镜取出术(FLEx)后早期角膜中央和周边区知觉的恢复情况。方法病例对照研究。收集接受SMILE和FLEx术的屈光不正患者47例(87只眼),其中SMILE组28例(53只眼),FLEx组19例(34只眼)。分别在术前、术后1周、1个月、3个月使用Cohet—Bonnet角膜知觉计检查角膜中央、上方、下方、鼻侧和颞侧5个部位的角膜知觉。不同部位之间和术前、术后不同时间段之间的差异采用Mann·Whitneyu检验,角膜中央区切除厚度、角膜中央厚度、术前等效球镜度、表面曲率等与角膜中央知觉变化之间采用Spearman相关分析。结果在术后1周、1个月和3个月时,SMILE组在中央、下方、鼻侧、颞侧(除上方外)的角膜知觉均较FLEx组高,且差异具有统计学意义(Z=-5.219,-7.120,-6.735,-7.139,-5.945,-6.644,-7.006,-7.121,-5.262,-3.086,-4.140,-3.523;P〈0.01)。而上方角膜知觉仪检查结果除了在术后1周时,SMILE组为(4.794-0.90)cm,FLEx组为(4.314-1.19)cm,两术式相比无统计学意义(Z=-1.807,P=0.071)外,在术后1个月和3个月时,SMILE组的角膜知觉分别为(5.23±0.62)和(5.57±0.57)cm,FLEx组的角膜知觉分别为(4.43±1.20)和(g.85±1.11)cm,两术式相比差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.935,-2.678;P=0.003,0.007),与其他部位相似。在SMILE组中,术后3个月时,中央、上方、下方、鼻侧、颞侧的角膜知觉分别为(5.744-0.51)、(5.57±0.57)、(5.70±0.55)、(5.83±0.37)、(5.84±0.30)em,与术前相比差异均无统计学意义(Z=一1.255,-0.893,-0.570,-0.630,-0.935;P=0.209,0.440,0.569,0.529,0.350)。在FLEx组术后3个月时,上方角膜知觉为(4.854-1.11)em,与术前相比差异无统计学意义(Z=-1.095,P=0.272)。SMILE和FLEx手术后角膜知觉的变化与角膜中央厚度、中央切除厚度、等效球镜度以及术前角膜表面曲率之间均无明显相关性(SMILE组:r=0.159,-0.202,0.106,0.060;P〉0.05。FLEx组:r=-0.156,-0.059,0.058,-0.005;P〉0.05)。结论SMILE和FLEx术后角膜知觉均下降,随着时间的延长角膜知觉逐渐恢复到术前水平,SMILE术后角膜知觉的下降程度较FLEx少且恢复较快。 Objective To evaluate and compare the recovery of central and peripheral corneal sensitivity in the early period after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx). Methods In this study, 47 cases (87 eyes) which underwent SMILE and FLEx were included. Central, superior, inferior, nasal and temporal corneal sensitivity was measured using a Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer (Luneau Ophthalmologie) before and 1 week, l month, and 3 months after SMILE and FLEx. The results were analyzed with Mann-Whitney test by SPSS13.0 software. Results There were statistical differences between SMILE and FLEx group in the central, inferior, nasal and temporal corneal sensitivity at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively (Z = - 5. 219, - 7. 120, - 6. 735, - 7. 139, -5.945, -6.644, -7.006, -7.121, -5.262, -3.086, -4.140, -3.523. P〈0.01). However, the superior corneal sensitivity in the SMILE group did not show significant difference ( Z = - 1. 807, P = 0. 071 ) as compared to FLEx group (with exception of 1 week postoperatively). At 1 month and 3 months postoperatively, corneal sensitivity in the superior quadrant were (5.23±0. 62) and (5.57±0. 57) cm in the SMILE group, and were (4.43±1.20) and (4.85±1. 11) cm in the FLEx group. There were statistical differences between these two groups ( Z = - 2. 935, - 2. 678. P = 0. 003, 0. 007 ). In the SMILE group, corneal sensitivity in the central, superior, inferior, nasal and temporal quadrants at 3 months postoperatively was (5.74 ±0. 51 ), (5.57 ±0. 57), (5.70±0. 55), (5.83±0. 37), (5.84±0. 30) cm respectively, there were no significant differences as compared with preoperative data (Z = - 1. 255, - 0. 893, - 0. 570, - 0. 630, - 0. 935. P = 0. 209, 0. 440, 0. 569, 0. 529, 0. 350). In the FLEx group, corneal sensitivity in the superior at 3 months postoperatively was 4. 85 ±1.11, there was not significant difference compared with preoperative data ( Z = - 1. 095, P=0. 272). There were no correlations between the changes of central corneal sensitivity and central corneal ablation depth, central corneal thickness and preoperative spherical equivalent ( SMILE group: r = 0. 159, - 0. 202, 0. 106, 0. 060. P 〉 0. 05. FLEx group : r = - 0. 156, - 0. 059, 0. 058, - 0. 005. P 〉 0. 05 ) after SMILE and FLEx surgery. Conclusions Corneal sensitivity decreases after SMILE and FLEx, and then returns to its original state over time. The decrease of corneal sensitivity after the SMILE was fewer and the recovery was faster as compared with FLEx.
出处 《中华眼科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第4期299-304,共6页 Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology
基金 国家自然科学基金(81170873) 天津市卫生局攻关项目(10KGl09)
关键词 近视 屈光外科手术 激光 飞秒 角膜基质 视知觉 对比研究 Myopia Refractive surgical procedures Laser, femtosecond Corneal stroma Visual perception Comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Lubatschowski H. Overview of commercially available femtosecond lasers in refractive surgery. J Refract Surg,2008,24:102-107.
  • 2Salomo MQ, Wilson SE. Femtosecond laser in laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg,2010, 36:1024-1032.
  • 3Sugar A. Ultrafast (femtosecond) laser refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2002, 13:246-249.
  • 4Sekundo W, Kunert K, Russmann C, et al. First efficacy and safety study of femtosecond lenticule extraction for the correction of myopia: six-month results. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2008,34: 1513-1520.
  • 5Shah R, Shah S, Sengupta S. Results of small incision lenticule extraction: all-in-one femtosecond laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2011, 37 : 127-137.
  • 6Donnenfeld ED, Ehrenhaus M, Solomon R, et al. Effect of hinge width on corneal sensation and dry eye after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004, 30:790-797.
  • 7Cruzat A, Pavan-Langston D, Hamrah P. In vivo confocal microscopy of corneal nerves: analysis and clinical correlation. Semin Ophthalmol, 2010, 25 : 171-177.
  • 8Tuisku IS, Lindbohm N, Wilson SE, et al. Dry eye and corneal sensitivity after high myopic LASIK. J Refract Surg, 2007, 23: 338-342.
  • 9吴莹,褚仁远,周行涛,戴锦晖,瞿小妹.准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术与准分子激光角膜上皮瓣下磨镶术后角膜知觉恢复的研究[J].中华眼科杂志,2005,41(11):972-976. 被引量:19
  • 10Perez-Santonja JJ, Sakla HF, Cardona C, et al. Corneal sensitivity after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis for low myopia. Am J Ophthalmol, 1999, 127:497- 504.

二级参考文献16

  • 1Müller LJ, Marfurt CF, Kruse F, et al. Corneal nerves: structure, contents and function. Exp Eye Res, 2003,76:521-542.
  • 2Wilson SE, Ambrosio R. Laser in situ keratomileusis-induced neurotrophic epitheliopathy. Am J Ophthalmol, 2001,132:405-406.
  • 3Martin XY, Safran AB. Corneal hypoesthesia. Surv Opthalmol, 1988,33:28-40.
  • 4Linna TU, Pérez-Santonja JJ, Tervo KM, et al. Recovery of corneal nerve morphology following laser in situ keratomileusis. Exp Eye Res, 1998,66:755-763.
  • 5Dennenfeld ED, Solomon K, Perry HD, et al. The effect of hinge position on corneal sensation and dry eye after LASIK. Ophthalmology, 2003,110:1023-1030.
  • 6Pérez-Santonja JJ, Sakla HF, Cardona C, et al. Corneal sensitivity after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis for low myopia. Am J Ophthalmol, 1999,127:497-504.
  • 7Kanellopoulos AJ, Pallikaris IG, Donnenfeld ED, et al. Comparison of corneal sensation following photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1997,23:34-38.
  • 8Linna TU, Vesaluoma MH, Pérez-Santonja JJ, et al. Effect of myopic LASIK on corneal sensitivity and morphology of subbasal nerves. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2000,41:393-397.
  • 9Campos M, Hertzog L, Garbus JJ, et al. Corneal sensitivity after photorefractive keratectomy. Am J Ophthalmol, 1992,114:51-54.
  • 10Tervo K, Latvala TM, Tervo TMT. Recovery of corneal innervation following photorefractive keratoablation. Arch Ophthalmol, 1994,112:1466-1470.

共引文献18

同被引文献249

  • 1张梅,刘祖国,陈家祺,罗丽辉,孙明霞,陈龙山,黄挺,王智崇.正常人角膜神经的共焦显微镜观察[J].中华眼科杂志,2004,40(9):632-634. 被引量:24
  • 2王雁,赵堪兴.波前像差与临床视觉矫正[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:41.
  • 3Kymionis GO, Kankariya VP, Plaka AD, et al. Femtosecond laser technology in corneal refractive surgery : a review. J Refract Surg, 2012, 28: 912?920.
  • 4Hatkay- Traub I, Juhasz T, Horvath C, et al. Ultra-short pulse (femtosecond) laser surgery: initial use in LASIK flap creation. Ophthalmol Clin North Am, 2001,14: 347?355.
  • 5Vestergaard A, Ivarsen A, Asp S, et al. Femtosecond (FS) laser vision correction procedure for morderate to high myopia: a propec? tive study of ReLEx ? flex and comparison with a retrospective study of FS?laser in situ keratomileusis. Acta Ophthalmol , 2013, 91: 355?362.
  • 6Vaddavalli PK, Yoo SH. Femtosecond laser in-situ keratomileusisb flap configurations. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2011, 22: 245? 250.
  • 7Kim P, Sutton GL, Rootman OS. Application of femtosecond laser in corneal refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2011, 22: 238?244.
  • 8Slade SG. The use of the femtosecond laser in the customization of corneal flaps in laser in situ keratomileusis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2007, 18: 314?317.
  • 9Chaurasia SS, Luengo GF, Tan K, et al. In vivo real-time intraocular pressure variations during LASIK flap creation. Invest Oph- thalmol Vis Sci, 2010, 51: 46414645.
  • 10Farjo AA, Sugar A, Schallhorn SC, et al. Femtosecond lasers for LASIK flap creation: a report by the american academy of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology, 2013, 120: e5-20.

引证文献19

二级引证文献151

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部