期刊文献+

悬臂梁式种植固定义齿的回顾性研究 被引量:7

Survival of Implant-supported Fixed Partial Prostheses with Cantilevers: A Retrospective Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价悬臂梁式种植固定义齿的长期临床效果。方法 :采用回顾性研究方法 ,收集2005-01—2011-06,在我科室采用悬臂梁式种植固定义齿修复58例患者(60个修复体,共103枚种植体)的临床及影像学资料。记录种植体的失败个数、修复体失败个数、边缘骨吸收情况、机械及生物并发症情况。结果:随访期内无种植体失败,有3个修复体失败。种植体7年累计存留率100%,修复体7年累计存留率为92.3%。随访期内并未见严重的边缘骨吸收,近悬臂端种植体周边缘骨吸收为(0.08±0.12)mm,远悬臂端种植体周边缘骨吸收为(0.09±0.14)mm。8个修复体(13%)、14枚种植体(14%)发生生物学并发症,11个修复体(18.3%)出现机械并发症。结论:本研究初步证实悬臂梁式种植固定义齿的修复方式临床效果是可靠的,可作为临床种植设计的一个可选方案。因较高的机械并发症,在选择螺丝固位方式时需加以注意。 Objective:To evaluate the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of implant-supported fixed partial dentures with cantilevers. Methods: The clinical and radiographic data of 103 implants-supported 60 fixed dentures with cantilevers in 58 patients were collected from January 2005 to June 2011 and retrospectively studied. Complication and failure of implants and/or prosthesis, peri-implant marginal bone loss, biological and technical complications were evaluated. Results: No implant failure was observed during the follow-up period. 3 prostheses were failed. The 7-year cumulative survival rate was 100% for implant-based analysis, and 92.3% for prostheses-based analysis. The mean peri- implant bone loss for implants mesial to cantilevers was (0.08±0.12) mm and (0.09±0.14) mm for implants distal to cantilever. 8 (13%) prostheses and 14 (14%) implants were exposed to biological complications, where as 11 (18.3%) prostheses were involved in technical complications. Conclusion: The retrospective study confirmed that implant-supported fixed partial dentures with cantilevers may be a valid treatment modality. Due to the high risk of mechanical complications, one should pay attention to the way of screw retention.
出处 《口腔颌面外科杂志》 CAS 2013年第2期116-119,共4页 Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
关键词 种植义齿 悬臂式修复体 并发症 存留率 dental implant cantilever fixed prostheses complications survival rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Gastaldo JF, Cury PR, Sendyk WR. Effect of the vertical and horizontal distances between adjacent implants and between a tooth and an implant on the incidence of interproximal papilla [J]. J Periodontol, 2004, 75(9):1242-1246.
  • 2Mombelli A, Lang NP. The diagnosis and treatment of peri-implantitis[J]. Periodontol 2000, 1998, 17:63-76.
  • 3Tan WC, Lang NP, Zwahlew M, et al. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. Part II: transalveolar technique [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2008, 35(8 Suppl): 241-254.
  • 4Halg GA, Schmid J, Htmmerle CH. Bone level changes at implants supporting crowns or fixed partial dentures with or without cantilevers [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008, 19(10):983-990.
  • 5Buser D, Mericske-sterm R, Bernard JP, et al. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1997, 8(3): 161-172.
  • 6Zurdo J, Romgo C, Wennstrtm JL. Survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed partial dentures with cantilevers: a systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009, 20(Suppl 4):59-66.
  • 7Mombelli A, Lang NP. Clinical parameters for the evaluation of dental implants [J]. Periodontol 2000, 1994, 4: 81-86.
  • 8Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlew M, et al. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2008, 35(8 Suppl): 216-240.
  • 9Barreto M, Francischone CE, Filho HN. Two prostheticcrowns supported by a single implant: an esthetic ahernative for restoring the anterior maxill [J]. Quintessence Int, 2008, 39(9):717-725.

同被引文献95

  • 1谢广平,韩栋伟.桥式固定种植义齿的研究进展[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2005,15(2):203-206. 被引量:5
  • 2余勇.后牙单端固定桥的临床观察[J].东南大学学报(医学版),2006,25(2):118-119. 被引量:3
  • 3何佳凝,岑远坤,毛祥彦,宫苹.全下颌牙种植义齿及支持组织应力的三维有限元分析Ⅵ.不同上部结构对覆盖种植义齿应力分布的影响[J].华西口腔医学杂志,1997,15(1):67-69. 被引量:11
  • 4Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M. Bone augmentation pro- cedures in implant dentistry[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009, 24 Suppl:237-259.
  • 5Tymstra N, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, et al. Dental implant treat- ment for two adjacent missing teeth in the maxillary aesthetic zone: a comparative pilot study and test of principle[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2011, 22(2):207-213.
  • 6Barbier L, Vander Sloten J, Krzesinski G, et al. Finite element analysis of non-axial versus axial loading of oral implants in the mandible of the dog[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 1998, 25(11):847-858.
  • 7Yokoyama S, Wakabayashi N, Shiota M, et al. The influence of implant location and length on stress distribution for three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2004, 91(3):234-240.
  • 8Wang C, Li Q, McClean C, et al. Numerical simulation of dental bone remodeling induced by implant-supported fixed partial den- ture with or without cantilever extension[J]. Int j numer method biomed eng, 2013, 29(10):1134-1147.
  • 9Li J, Li H, Shi L, et al. A mathematical model for simulating the bone remodeling process under mechanical stimulus[J]. Dent Ma- ter, 2007, 23(9):1073-1078.
  • 10Pjetursson BE, Thoma D, Jung R, et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23 Suppl 6:22-38.

引证文献7

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部