期刊文献+

中国证券市场监管有效性评价——基于问卷调研数据的实证分析 被引量:5

An Evaluation on the Regulation Effectiveness in Chinese Securities Market——An Empirical Analysis Based on the Questionnaire Survey Data
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以往对中国证券市场监管有效性的认识多局限在现象描述上,或对违规行为处罚的效果上,现有文献鲜见对中国证券市场监管有效性进行全面的实证分析。通过向监管部门、基金公司、券商、上市公司等进行问卷调研,对我国证券监管有效性整体和对证监会发布的《上市公司解除限售存量股份转让指导意见》这项具体政策进行了评价。结果表明,所有被调查者对证券监管有效性的整体评价和对具体政策效果的具体评价都没有达到4分(满分7分)的水平。 Since the past understanding of the actual situation of supervision effectiveness is limited to phenomena descriptions or to the result of punishment on violation behavior,there are few literatures doing comprehensive empirical analysis on this issue.This paper sends questionnaires to regulators,funds security companies,listing companies,managers of companies and etc.The participants are required to evaluate the comprehensive effect of China’s supervision on security market and the specific policy released by the CSRC with the name of "the guidance for the listed company to remove limited sales stock share transfers".Based on the comprehensive evaluation of the supervision effectiveness,this paper carries out empirical analysis.The quantitative conclusion of this paper is all the surveyors’ evaluation on the effectiveness of security market and the specific policy are less than 4 score(7 is the highest score).
作者 郝旭光
出处 《烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期111-117,共7页 Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目"我国资本市场系统稳定性评估和监测研究"(11AZD010)
关键词 监管有效性 整体评价 具体政策评价 政策意图 满意度 supervision effectiveness overall evaluation specific supervision policy evaluation policy purpose satisfaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献40

  • 1张育军.中国证券市场监管能力和监管效率分析[J].证券市场导报,2003(7):4-14. 被引量:26
  • 2游士兵,吴圣涛.中国证券违法犯罪的实证研究[J].证券市场导报,2001(6):16-20. 被引量:33
  • 3陈工孟,高宁.我国证券监管有效性的实证研究[J].管理世界,2005,21(7):40-47. 被引量:110
  • 4张翼,马光.法律、公司治理与公司丑闻[J].管理世界,2005,21(10):113-122. 被引量:78
  • 5Allen, Franklin, J. Qian, M. Qian. Law, Finance and Economic Growth in China [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2005, 77(1).
  • 6Ashbaugh-Skaife H., D. Collins, W. Kinney, R. LaFond. The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies and Their Remediation on Accrual Quality[J]. The Accounting Review, 2008, 83(1).
  • 7Ashbaugh-Skaife H., D. Collins, W. Kinney. The Discovery and Reporting of Internal Control Deficiencies Prior to SOX-mandated Audit[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2007, 44(1).
  • 8Berkowitz D., K. Pistor, J. F. Richrad. Economic Development, Legality, and the Transplant Effect[J]. European Economic Review, 2003, 47 (1).
  • 9Bhattacharya U., H Daouk. The World Price of Insider Trading[J]. Journal of Finance, 2002, 57(1).
  • 10Chan K., B. Farrell, P. Lee. Earnings Management of Firms Reporting Material Internal Control Weaknesses under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act[R]. Working Paper,2007.

共引文献114

同被引文献39

  • 1张宗新,朱伟骅.增强信息透明度能否提升公司价值?[J].南方经济,2007,36(7):47-59. 被引量:19
  • 2Daniel K., Hirshleifer D., S. H. Teoh. Investor Psychology in Capital Markets:Evidence and Policy Implications [J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 2002, (49).
  • 3O'Donoghue T., Matthew Rabin. Do It Right Now or Later[J]. The American Economic Review, 1999,(89).
  • 4Hammond, J.S., Keeney, R.L., & Raiffa, H.S. The Hidden Traps in Decision Making [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1998, (Sep./Oct.).
  • 5Kahneman D., Tversky, A. Judgment under Uncertainty:Heuristics and Biases[J]. Science, 1974,(185).
  • 6Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk[J]. Econometrica, 1979,47(2).
  • 7Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. The Framing of the Decision and the Psychology of Choice[J]. Science, 1981,(211).
  • 8Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions[J]. The Journal of Business, 1986, (59).
  • 9Kahneman D. Tversky,A. Perspective on Judgment and Choice[J]. American Psychological Association, 2003, (58).
  • 10Pious, S. The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making[M]. Columbus: McGraw-Hill, 2004.

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部