期刊文献+

血管活性肠肽和甲泼尼龙对内毒素性休克大鼠肠道Toll样受体mRNA表达的影响 被引量:2

Vasoactive intestinal peptide and methylprednisolone change intestinal Toll-like receptor mRNA expres- sion in rats with endotoxic shock
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨血管活性肠肽(vasoactive intestinal peptide,VIP)和甲泼尼龙(methylprednisolone,MP)对细菌脂多糖(lipopolysaccharide,LPS)致休克大鼠肠道组织Toll样受体(Toll-like receptor,TLR)2 mRNA和TLR4 mRNA表达的影响.方法 90只SD大鼠,随机分为LPS组(20只)、LPS+ VIP组(20只)、LPS +MP组(20只)、LPS +VIP+ MP组(20只)和对照组(10只).LPS组尾静脉注射LPS(E Coli O55B5)10 mg/kg;LPS +VIP组尾静脉注射LPS 10 mg/kg后注射VIP(5 nmol/kg);LPS+ MP组尾静脉注射LPS 10 mg/kg后注射MP 3 mg/kg; LPS+ VIP+ MP组尾静脉注射LPS 10 mg/kg后注射VIP 5 nmol/kg+ MP 3 mg/kg;对照组尾静脉注射等容量生理盐水.分别于注射后6h和24 h处死,留取肠道组织标本,RT-PCR检测肠道TLR2/4 mRNA表达,光镜下观察肠组织病理变化.结果 注射LPS后大鼠肠黏膜坏死脱落,微绒毛结构消失,结缔组织充血,炎性细胞浸润.采用VIP、MP或VIP +MP干预组病变较轻.注射LPS6h,LPS组(1.14 ±0.38,1.21 ±0.18)、LPS+ VIP组(1.17±0.42,1.04±0.38)、LPS+ MP组(1.16±0.41,1.11±0.34)和LPS+VIP+MP组(0.92±0.29,1.01±0.20) TLR2 mRNA与TLR4 mRNA表达均高于对照组(0.32±0.20,0.24±0.17) (P <0.01),LPS组、LPS +VIP组、LPS+ MP组和LPS+ VIP+ MP组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).注射LPS 24 h后,LPS+ VIP组(0.63±0.12,0.67 ±0.09)、LPS+ MP组(0.59 ±0.13,0.64 ±0.09)和LPS+ VIP+ MP组(0.52±0.19,0.51 ±0.31)TLR2 mRNA与TLR4 mRNA表达明显低于LPS组(1.04 ±0.38,0.82 ±0.18) (P <0.05).结论 VIP和糖皮质激素的胃肠保护作用与炎症信号TLR2/4 mRNA表达改变有关,在LPS休克6h内,VIP或MP和VIP +MP对肠道TLR2/4 mRNA表达影响不明显,24h时VIP、MP和VIP +MP可下调TLR2/4 mRNA表达. Objective To investigate the effect of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and methylprednisolone (MP) on Toll-like receptor (TLR)2/4 mRNA expression in endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide,LPS) induced shock.Methods Ninety Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into LPS group (n =20),LPS + VIP group (n =20),LPS + MP group (n =20),LPS + VIP + MP group (n =20) and control group (n =10).LPS group injected intravenously LPS (E Coli O55B5) 10 mg/kg.LPS + VIP group,LPS + MP group and LPS + VIP + MP group were injected intravenously VIP 5 nmol/kg,MP 3 mg/kg and VIP 5 nmoL/kg + MP 3 mg/kg after LPS 10 mg/kg injection.The control group injected normal saline intravenously instead of LPS.The rats were sacrificed at 6 h and 24 h after injection and the intestine samples were collected.Pathological changes of the intestine were observed by microscopy.RT-PCR was used to detect the intestinal TLR2 mRNA and TLR4 mRNA expressions.Results Intestinal mucosa showed edema or necrotic change with structure of the microvilli disappeared after LPS injection.The inestinal lesions in VIP,MP and VIP + MP groups were milder than LPS group.At 6 h after LPS injection,TLR2 mRNA and TLR4 mRNA expressions were significantly up-regulated in LPS group,LPS + VIP group,LPS + MP group and LPS + VIP + MP group (TLR2 mRNA:1.14 ±0.38,1.17 ±0.42,1.16 ±0.41,0.92 ± 0.29;TLR4 mRNA 1.21 ±0.18,1.04 ± 0.38,1.11 ± 0.34,1.01 ± 0.20) compared with the control group (0.32 ± 0.20,0.24 ± 0.17) (P 〈 0.01).But there was no significant difference between LPS group,LPS + VIP group,LPS + MP group and LPS + VIP + MP group (P 〉 0.05).At 24 h after LPS injection,TLR2 mRNA and TLR4 mRNA expressions in LPS + VIP group,LPS + MP group and LPS + VIP + MP group (TLR2 mRNA:0.63 ± 0.12,0.59 ± 0.13,0.52 ±0.19;TLR4 mRNA 0.67 ±0.09,0.64 ±0.09,0.51 ±0.13) were significantly lower than LPS group (1.04 ± 0.38,0.82 ±0.18) (P 〈0.01) (P 〈0.05).Conclusion VIP and/or MP can mitigate intestinal injury induced by LPS shock.The gastrointestinal protection of VIP and glucocorticoids were related to downregulation signaling TLR2 mRNA and TLR4 mRNA expression.But VIP/MP and VIP + MP have no significant effect on expression of intestinal TLR2/4 mRNA until 24 h after LPS shock.
出处 《中国小儿急救医学》 CAS 2013年第2期149-152,158,共5页 Chinese Pediatric Emergency Medicine
基金 上海市卫生局科技发展基金(编号:05041)
关键词 肠组织 TOLL样受体 内毒素性休克 血管活性肠肽 糖皮质激素 大鼠 Intestine Toll-like receptor Lipopolysaccharide shock Vasoactive intestinal peptide Glucocorticoids Rat
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Delgado M, Pozo D, Ganea D. The significance of vasoactive intestinal peptide. Pharmacol Rev,2004,56 (2) :249-290.
  • 2Keh D, Sprung C. Use of corticosteroid therapy in patients with sepsis and septic shock: An evidence-based review. Crit Care Med,2004,32( 11 ) : S527-523.
  • 3Annane D. Glucocorticoids in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. Curr Opin Crit Care,2005,11 (5) :449-453.
  • 4Tsujimoto H, Ono S, Efron PA, et al. Role of Toll-like receptors in the development of sepsis. Shock,2008,29 ( 3 ) :315-321.
  • 5Salomao R, Martins PS, Brunialti MK, et al. TLR signaling pathway in patients with sepsis. Shock,2008,30 ( Suppl 1 ) :73- 77.
  • 6杨丽萍,张育才,汤定华,滕国良,张宇鸣.血管活性肠肽对内毒素性休克大鼠肺损伤的保护作用[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2008,17(9):952-955. 被引量:3
  • 7Comell TT, Wynn J, Shanley TP, et al. Mechanisms and regula- tion of the gene-expression response to sepsis. Pediatrics,2010, 125(6) :1248-1258.
  • 8Walter L, Biffi MD, Ernest E, et al. Role of gut in multiple or- gan failure. In : Willian Cs, eds. Textbook of critical care. Ber- lin:Harcourt Acia,2001 : 1627-1638.
  • 9Haseeb MA, Salwen MJ. Collateral damage: Sepsis-induced gut injury. Crit Care Meal,2005,33(10) :2439-2440.
  • 10van der Voort PH. Linking gut-associated lymphoid tissue to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and infection. Crit Care Med,2006,34( 1 ) :257-258.

二级参考文献70

  • 1杨丽萍,张育才.血管活性肠肽和垂体腺苷酸环化酶激肽在感染性休克中的作用[J].国外医学(儿科学分册),2005,32(2):74-76. 被引量:1
  • 2张育才,杨丽萍,汤定华,张宇鸣.血管活性肠肽对大鼠内毒素性休克肠道损伤保护作用的研究[J].中华儿科杂志,2006,44(5):369-373. 被引量:19
  • 3张育才,张宇鸣,徐梁,汤定华.源于胃肠道感染的小儿脓毒性休克及多器官功能障碍综合征[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2006,15(6):494-497. 被引量:15
  • 4Watson RS, Carillo JA, Linde-Zwirble, et al. The epidemiology of severe sepsis in children in the United States. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2003, 167: 695-701.
  • 5Walter L, Bifll MD, Ernest E, et al. Role of gut in multiple organ failure. In: Willian Cs, eds. Textbook of critical care. Berlin: Harcourt Acia, 2001:1627-1638.
  • 6Haseeb MA, Salwen MJ. Collateral damage: Sepsis-induced gut injury. Crit Care Med, 2005,33:2439-2440.
  • 7Hotchkiss RS, Karl IE. The pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis. N Engl J Med, 2003,348:138-150.
  • 8Langheinrich AC, Ritman EL. Quantitative imaging of mierovascular permeability in a rat model of lipepolysaeeharideinduced sepsis : evaluation using cryostatic micro-computed tomography. Invest Radiol,2006,41:645-650.
  • 9Han X, Fink MP, Yang R, et al. Increased iNOS activity is essential for intestinal epithelial tight junction dysfunction in endotoxemic mice. Shock,2004, 21:261-270.
  • 10Steinberg SM. Bacrterial translocation: what it is and what it is not. Am J Stag, 2003,186:301-305.

共引文献10

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部