期刊文献+

对英语专业研究生学术能力内涵及其发展过程的再思考 被引量:23

A Revisit to the Connotation and Development Process of English Postgraduates’ Academic Competence
原文传递
导出
摘要 在全球化、国际化背景下,英语专业研究生学术能力发展的必要性和重要性日益凸显。相关文献研究表明,对英语专业研究生学术能力内涵及发展过程的研究较少。本文运用思辨式方法,将学术能力分为元学术能力、学术能力两个层次,其中学术能力又包括语言能力(外语能力和母语能力)、知识能力(知识建构和应用能力)和研究能力(一般研究和创新研究能力)。学术能力发展到一定阶段后会形成学术感。同时,本研究从学术能力内涵角度指出英语专业研究生在内外因素的共同作用下,通过教学互动的学习、实践、研究发展自身学术能力;文章从研究生教育相关因素角度指出,英语专业研究生整体学术能力发展应在需求分析基础上,结合研究生培养规划,从培养目标、课程设置、教材建设、教学指导、评估考核等方面进行。 Under the background of globalization and internationalization, the development of English postgraduates’ academic competence has been increasingly important. Relevant literature review indicates that there are few researches concerned. By means of critical thinking, this study classifies academic competence into academic competence and meta-academic competence. The former can be further divided into language competence (foreign language competence and native language competence), knowledge competence (competence for knowledge construct and application) and research competence (general and creative research competence). The development of academic competence will lead to the cultivation of academic awareness. From the perspective of this connotation, it further points out that under the influence of both internal and external factors, individual English postgraduate will improve his academic competence via learning, practice and research. From the perspective of relevant factors concerning postgraduate education, it points out that based on the needs analysis and follow relevant programs, English postgraduates will improve their academic competence via developing cultivation goals, curricula design, teaching materials, supervision, evaluation, etc.
作者 王雪梅
机构地区 上海外国语大学
出处 《当代外语研究》 2013年第2期32-36,78,共5页 Contemporary Foreign Language Studies
基金 国家社科青年项目(10CYY017) 教育部新世纪优秀人才项目 上海市教育科学研究项目(B10014) 上海外国语大学青年教师科研创新团队(QJTD11WXM01) 重大项目(KX161027)阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Bachman, L. 1990. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing [M]. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • 2Boyer, E. L. 1990. Scholarship Reconsidered : Priorities of the Professoriate [R]. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
  • 3DiPerna, J.C. S. N. Elliott. 1999. The development and validation of the Academic Competence Evaluation Scale [J]. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 17 (3) : 207-25.
  • 4DiPerna, J. C. & S.N. Elliott. 2000. The Academic Competence Evaluation Scales (ACES K-12) [M]. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Association.
  • 5DiPerna, J. C. b-S. N. Elliott. 2001. The Academic Competence Evaluation Scales (ACES- College) [M]. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Association.
  • 6Elliott, S. N.& J. C. DiPerrm. 2002. Assessing the academic competence of college students.. Validation of a selbreport measure of skills and enablers [J]. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability 15(2) .. 87-100.
  • 7Gonzdlez, J. R. Wagenaar (eds). 2008. Tuning Educational Structures in Europe H : Universities Contribu- tion to the Bologna Process [M]. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto.
  • 8Pascarella, E. I. & P. I. Terenzini. 2005. How College Affects Students A Decade of Research [M]. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
  • 9Richards, J. C. & D. Nunan. 2000. Second Language Teacher Education [C]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
  • 10曹德明.高等外语院校国际化外语人才培养的若干思考[J].外语教学理论与实践,2011(3):1-5. 被引量:114

二级参考文献68

同被引文献252

引证文献23

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部