期刊文献+

词—面孔Stroop范式在态度测量上的应用尝试

A application of Face-Word Stroop Paradigm in the measurement of attitudes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 该研究的目的是通过单纯呈现效应来探讨词-面孔Stroop范式的新应用。该研究以人脸图片与形容词为刺激材料,以大学生为被试,采用了与词-面孔Stroop范式类似的方法来测量被试对面孔的态度。先向被试随机呈现两组经评定为中等评价的人脸图片,其中一组呈现十次,另一组呈现一次,以诱发单纯呈现效应。再向被试呈现已叠加形容词的人脸图片,形容词是对人积极的或消极的评价,人脸图片是先前呈现过的,要求被试判断词是积极的还是消极的。结果发现,呈现次数和形容词属性的交互作用显著。被试对呈现次数少的人脸图片叠加积极形容词后的反应时与叠加消极形容词后的反应时无显著差异,而对呈现次数多的人脸图片叠加积极形容词后的反应时则显著短于叠加消极形容词后的反应时,证明了实验方法的有效性。 The research uses face images and adjec- tives as stimulus material, a total of 36 students as par- ticipants, by a method similar to the word - face Stroop paradigm to verify the mere exposure effect. Finstly, two groups of medium-evaluated face images were pre-sented to the presented ten participants times while randomly, one group was another group one time to induce the mere exposure effect. Then the presented images with positive or negative people evaluation ad- jectives were presented to participants again, and ask the participants to decide whether the word is positive or negative. The result indicated that, there is a signifi- cant interaction between presented times and adjec- tives. To the less times presented images, there was no significant difference of react ion time between positive adjectives attached and negative adjectives attached, however, on the other hand, to tile more times present- ed images, the reaction time of images with positive adjectives attached was significantly shorter than the mages with negative adjectives attached. This phe- aomenon successfully verified the effectiveness of ex- periment method.
作者 余快 徐展
出处 《社会心理科学》 2013年第3期41-45,共5页 Science of Social Psychology
关键词 单纯呈现效应 情绪STROOP效应 词一面孔Stroop范式 The Effects of Mere Exposure EmotionalStroop Response Conflicts Face-Word StroopParadigm
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1陈俊,刘海燕,张积家.Stroop效应研究的新进展——理论、范式及影响因素[J].心理科学,2007,30(2):415-418. 被引量:51
  • 2侯舒艨,周蔚,郭小迪,周仁来.内隐联结测验下单纯呈现效应与积极情感的产生[J].心理科学,2008,31(5):1108-1111. 被引量:6
  • 3屠莺,周仁来.单纯呈现效应与积极情感的产生[J].心理科学,2008,31(2):356-362. 被引量:3
  • 4Algom D, Chajut E, Lev S. (2004). A rationallook at the emotional stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a Stroop effect. Journal of Experi- mental Psychology General, 133(3), 323-338.
  • 5De Houwer J. (2003). A structural analysis of indirect measures of attitudes. In J. Musch & K.C. Klauer (Eds.), The Psychology of Evaluation: Affec- rive Processes in Cognition and Emotion (pp. 219-244). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • 6Greenwald A G, & Banaji M R. (1995). Im- plicit Social Cognition, Attitudes, Self-Esteem and Stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4-27.
  • 7Greenwald A G, McGhee D E, Schwartz J L K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in impficit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464 -1480.
  • 8Haas B W, Omura K, Constable 1K T. (2006). Interference produced by emotional conflict associated with anterior cingulate activation. Cognitive, Affec- rive, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 6(2), 152-156.
  • 9Jacoby L L, Woloshyn V, Kelley C. (1989). Becoming Famous Without Being Recognized:Un- conscious influences of memory produced by dividing at tention , Journal of experimental psychology ,Gen- eral ,118 (2) , 115-125.
  • 10Jennifer L. Monahan, Sheila T. Murphy, Zajonc R B. (2000). Subliminal mere exposure : Spe- cific , General , and Diffuse Effects ,Psychological Science,l 1 (6) :462 - 466.

二级参考文献57

共引文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部