摘要
《左传》记事始于隐公的问题是经学研究的重要话题。古代经学家多通过"始隐说"将《春秋》说成是兴王之作。但是《左传》隐公记事却表达了不同立场。《左传》隐公记事虽然表现出尊王倾向,但突出的却是天下无王为势所必然。《左传》隐公记事对隐公的描写并未显示出后世经学家所说的"王鲁"迹象,对郑庄公的肯定态度则显示了《左传》认同霸主政治的思想倾向。《春秋》兴王说也是一家之言。
Why the outset of Zuozhuan is Duke Yin was important topic of Chinese classical studies, the ancient classics scholars said Spring and Autumn as a book for reconstruction of kingly order. But Duke Yin of Lu Chronicle in Zuozhuan expressed a different stance, which although showed the tendency of respecting monarchy, but the highlight is the Inevitable of no monarchy. The description of Duke Yin in Zuozhuan has not shown signs of Lu Kingdom as monarchy said by later generations classics scholars, and the affirmative attitude to Duke Zhuang of Zheng showed an agree tendency to hegemony politics.
出处
《北京青年政治学院学报》
2013年第2期107-111,共5页
Journal of Beijing Youth Politics College
关键词
《左传》
鲁隐公
兴王
Zuozhuan
Duke Yin of Lu
reconstruction of kingly order
