1Aitchison J,1986. The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data:Monographs in Statistics and Applied Probability. London:Chapman and Hall.
2Alberts AC, 1992. Constraints on the design of chemical commu-nication systems in terrestrial vertebrates. American Naturalist139: 62-89.
3Alberts AC, 1993. Chemical and behavioral studies of femoralgland secretions in iguanid lizards. Brain Behavior and Evolu-tion 41: 255-260.
4Aragdn P,Lopez P, Martin J,2001. Discrimination of femoralgland secretions from familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics bymale Iberian rock-lizards Lacerta monticola. Journal of Her-petology 35: 346-350.
5Barbosa D, Desfilis E,Carretero MA, Font E, 2005. Chemicalstimuli mediate species recognition in Podarcis wall lizards.Amphibia-Reptilia 26: 257-263.
6Barbosa D, Font E, Desfilis E, Carretero MA, 2006. Chemicallymediated species recognition in closely related Podarcis walllizards. Journal of Chemical Ecology 32: 1587-1598.
7Boughman JW, 2002. How sensory drive can promote speciation.Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 571-577.
8Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SV, 1998. Principles of Animal Com-munication. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer AssociatesBrennan PA, Kendrick KM, 2006. Mammalian social odours:Attraction and individual recognition. Philosophical Transac-tions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 361:2061-2078.
9Capula M, 2002. Genetic evidence of natural hybridization be-tween Podarcis sicula and Podarcis tiliguerta (Reptilia: Lacer-tidae). Amphibia-Reptilia 23: 313-321.
10Carazo P, Font E,Desfilis E, 2007. Chemosensory assessment ofrival competitive ability and scent mark function in a lizardPodarcis hispanica. Animal Behaviour 74: 895-902.
