期刊文献+

替吉奥隔日方案联合低剂量顺铂治疗老年非小细胞肺癌疗效观察 被引量:2

Observation of therapeutic efficacy of using S-1 every other day program and low dose DDP in the treatment of elderly patients with NSCLC
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的替吉奥胶囊施行隔日给药联合低剂量顺铂化疗,评价其对老年非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效。方法将55例老年NSCLC患者分为两组,分别行替吉奥隔日给药联合低剂量顺铂治疗和常规剂量治疗,观察两组疗效和不良反应。结果隔日低剂量组和常规剂量组RR率分别为26.7%和28%,1、2年生存率分别为53.3%、33.3%和56%、32%,差异无统计学意义;但隔日低剂量组Ⅲ~Ⅳ级血液性、消化道等毒性反应明显低于常规剂量组。结论两方案近期疗效相同,但隔日低剂量组不良反应发生率低,不需水化,门诊随访治疗,实现低成本和良好患者依从性。 Objective The therapeutic efficacy of using S-1 every other day program plus low dose DDP and that of Conventional dose regimen to treat elderly patients with NSCLC were compared in this article. Methods All of 55 el- derly patents with NSCLC were divided into two groups, with one group being treated with the Gio every other day joint administration of low-dose cisplatin therapy and the other group with conventional-dose therapy for at least two cycles, during which the effects were observed and adverse reactions were performed pathological diagnosis. Results The next day, the RR rate of the low-dose group and the conventional-dose group were 26.7% and 28%, and the av- erage survival time for these two groups were respectively 53.3%, 33.3%, 56%, 32%. Therefore, the difference was not statistically significant; however, the next day the low-dose group was significantly lower than conventional dose group in Ⅲ~Ⅳ blood and gastrointestinal toxicity. Conclusion The efficacy of the two programs are the same. However, com- pared with the conventional--dose program, low-dose program has lower incidence of adverse effects, and does not need the hydration and outpatient follow-up treatment. It also has the advantages of low cost and good patient compliance.
出处 《中国现代医生》 2013年第11期77-78,共2页 China Modern Doctor
关键词 替吉奥 隔日 NSCLC 老年 S-1 Next day NSCLC Elderly patients
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献39

  • 1秦叔逵,龚新雷.晚期胃癌化疗的现状和新进展[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2006,11(9):641-652. 被引量:268
  • 2Shirasaka T. New oral anticancer drug, ( TS - 1 ) - from bench to clinic [J]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho,2001.
  • 3Koizumi W. S - 1 plus cisplatin versus S - 1 alone for first - line treatment of advanced gastric cancer ( SPIRITS trial) :a phase. Ⅲ trial[J]. Lancel Oncol,2008.
  • 4Takahashi I. S - 1 in the treatment of advanced and recurrent gastric cancercurrent state and future prospects [ J ]. GASTRIC CANCER,2003.
  • 5Boku N. Chemotherapy for metastatic disease:review from JCOG trials [ J ]. International Journal of Clinical Oncology ,2008.
  • 6Malet-Martino M,Martino R.Clinical studies of three oral prodrugs of 5-fluorouracil (capecitabine,UFT,S-1):a review.Oncologist,2002,7:288-323.
  • 7Hoff PM.The tegafur-based dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitory fluoropyrimidines,UFT/leucovorin (ORZEL) and S-1:a review of their clinical development and therapeutic potential.Invest New Drugs,2000,18:331-342.
  • 8Fukushima M,Morita M,Ikeda K,et al.Population study of expression of thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in patients with solid tumors.Int J Mol Med,2003,12:839-844.
  • 9Kaira K,Sunaga N,Yanagitani N,et al.A phase Ⅰ dose-escalation study of S-1 plus carboplatin in patients with advanced non-smallcell lung cancer.Anticancer Drugs,2007,18:471-476.
  • 10Ohba T,Yamasaki T,Endo Y,et al.A phase Ⅰ study of TS-1plus carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.J Chemother,2009,21:80-85.

共引文献81

同被引文献22

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部