期刊文献+

CD64在感染性疾病中诊断价值的研究 被引量:8

Diagnosis significance of determination of neutrophil CD64 mean fluorescence intensity index within infection diseases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的应用流式细胞术测定外周血粒细胞表面CD64表达强度,评价CD64在诊断细菌感染性疾病中的实用价值。方法将100名研究对象分为4组,即细菌感染组、病毒感染组、真菌性感染组和正常对照组。使用流式细胞术、免疫浊度法分别检测外周血中性粒细胞CD64和C反应蛋白(CRP)水平。结果细菌性感染组患者外周血CD64指数(11.10±5.98)明显高于正常对照(2.976±0.807),差异有统计学意义(F=3.125,P<0.05);病毒感染组患者CD64指数(3.175±0.801)和真菌感染组患者CD64指数(3.780±0.896)明显低于细菌感染组;12例细菌感染患者抗生素治疗前CD64指数(12.981±4.525)明显高于治疗后(7.754±2.978),差异有统计学意义(t=4.182,P<0.01)。结论中性粒细胞CD64指数可以以作为诊断细菌感染的敏感指标,特别是对败血症的诊断更有价值,其敏感性和特异性均明显优于C反应蛋白。 Objective Using flow cytometry to detect circulating granulocytes surface CD64 mean fluorescence intensity index ( CD64 index) ,and evaluate the practical value of CD64 in diagnosis of bacterial infection. Methods 100 subjects were classified into four groups:bacterial infection, viral infection, fungal infection and healthy control. The levels of the in- dex of CD64, C reaction protein (CRP) in the peripheral blood were measured by automatic flow cytometry and immunoturbi- dimetry. Results The index of CD64 in the peripheral blood in bacterial infection group ( 11. 1029 ± 5. 983 ) was signifi- cantly higher than that in the healthy control group { 2.976 ±0. 807 } [ P 〈 0.05 ) ; index of CD64 in viral infection group { 3. 175±0. 801 ) and fungal infection group{3. 780 ±0. 896} were significantly lower than bacterial infection group; according to the ROC curve , the best threshold in diagnosis of infection was 3.63 with the sensitivity of 96.1% and the specificity of 90.2% ,which is notably advanced than CRP; The index of CD64 index in the pre treatment group( 12. 981 ±4.525 } was higher than that in the post treatment group ( 7. 754±2. 978 ) ( P 〈 0.01 ) in 11 cases of infectious patients, implicated that the dynamic monitoring of CD64 index may assist in the treatment evaluation. Conclusion Neutrophil surface CD64 index may be a sensitive index for diagnosing bacterial infection, especially sepsis, which sensitivity and specificity are superior to CRP.
作者 武超
出处 《安徽预防医学杂志》 2013年第2期117-119,共3页 Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine
关键词 受体 CD64 感染性疾病 流式细胞术 receptor CD64 infection flow cytometry
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Hoffmann JJ. Neutrophil CD64: a diagnostic marker for infection and sepsis. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2009,47 (8) : 903 -916.
  • 2Ng PC, Li G, Chui KM, et al. Neutrophil CD64 is a sensi- tive diagnostic marker for early - onset neonatal infection [ J ]. Pediatr Res,2004,56 (5) :796 - 803.
  • 3Zhang G, Qiao s, Li Q, et al. Molecular cloning and ex- pression of the porcine hish - affinity immunoglobulin G Fc receptor (FcgammaRI) [ J ]. Immunogeneties, 2006,58 (10) :845 - 849.
  • 4Danikas DD, Karakantza M, Theodorou GL, et al. Prog- nostic value of phagocytic activity of neutrophils and monocytcs in sepsis. Correlation to CD64 and CD14 anti- gen expression[ J ]. Clin Exp lmmuno1,2008,154 ( 1 ) : 87 - 97.
  • 5Allen E, Uakkc AC, eurtTmr MZ, et al. Neutrophil CD64 expression:distinguishing acute inflammatory antoimmune disease from systemic infections [ J ]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2002,61 (6) :522 - 525.
  • 6Davis BH, 01sen SH, Ahmad E, et al. Neutrophil CD64 is fill improved indicator of infection or sepsis in emergency department patients[J]. Arch Pathol lab Med,2006,130 (5) :654-661.
  • 7Jaye DL, Waites KB. Clinical applications of C - reac- tive protein in pediatrics. Pediatr Infect Dis J, 1997,16 (8) :735 -46.
  • 8郝玲,杨恒伟,李艳芝,李彦敏,刘桂玲,董红红.败血症新生儿血中性粒细胞CD_(64)表达的意义[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2007,22(22):1701-1702. 被引量:18

二级参考文献10

  • 1邱玉芳,沙莉.C-反应蛋白、白细胞介素-6、肿瘤坏死因子-α在新生儿败血症早期诊断中的价值[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2005,20(5):455-456. 被引量:21
  • 2郝玲,李艳芝.CD64和新生儿感染[J].国外医学(儿科学分册),2005,32(3):176-178. 被引量:8
  • 3徐茜茜,陈灵芝,徐海滨,张宇,包曼华.CD64在新生儿感染诊断中的价值[J].临床儿科杂志,2006,24(3):185-187. 被引量:7
  • 4Ng PC,Lam HS.Diagnostic markers for neonatal sepsis[J].Curr Opin Pediatr,2006,18(2):125-131.
  • 5Schmidt RE,Gessner JE.Fc receptors and their interaction with complement in autoimmunity[J].Immunol Lett,2005,100(1):56-57.
  • 6Gualdi S,Tridapalli E,Maldini MC,et al.CD64 as a diagnostic marker for neonatal infection:159[J].Pediatr Res,2005,58(2):381.
  • 7Barth E,Fischer G,Schneider EM,et al.Differences in the expression of CD64 and mCD14 on polymorphonuclear cells and on monocytes in patients with septic shock[J].Cytokine,2001,14(5):299-302.
  • 8Ng PC,Li K,Wong RP,et al.Neutrophil CD64 expresssion:A sensitive diagnostic marker for late-onset nosocomial infection in very low birthweight infants[J].Pediatr Res,2002,51(3):296-303.
  • 9Fjaertoft G,Hakansson L,Ewald U,et al.Neutrophils from term and preterm newborn infants express the high affinity Fcgamma-receptor I(CD64) during bacterial infections[J].Pediatr Res,1999,45(6):871-877.
  • 10中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组,余加林,吴仕孝.新生儿败血症诊疗方案[J].中华儿科杂志,2003,41(12):897-899. 被引量:1026

共引文献17

同被引文献77

  • 1邵洁,黄新文,孙眉月,杜立中,汤永民,乐园罗.新生儿败血症外周血中性粒细胞CD_(64)的表达及其意义[J].中华儿科杂志,2005,43(7):510-513. 被引量:24
  • 2Lee SH,Chan RC,Wu JY,et al. Diagnostic value of procalcitonin for bacterial infection in elderly patients-a systemic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Clin Pract,2013,67(12):1530.
  • 3Genel F, Atlihan F, Gulez N, et al. Evaluation of adhesion mole- cules CD64,CDllb and CD62L in neutrophils and monocytes of peripheral blood for early diagnosis of infection[J]. World J Pedi- atr,2012,8(1) :72.
  • 4Jekarl DW, Lee SY, Lee J, et al. Procalcitonin as a diagnostic marker and IL-6 as a prognostic marker for sepsis[J]. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. 2013,75(4):342.
  • 5Rittirsch D, Flied MA, Ward PA. Harmful molecular mechanisms in sepsis. Nature Rev Immunol, 2008,8 : 776-787.
  • 6Calandra T, Cohen J, International Sepsis Forum Definition of Infec- tion in the 1CU Consensus Conference. The international sepsis forum consensus conference on definitions of infection in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med ,2005,33 : 1538-1548.
  • 7Dombrovskiy VY, Martin AA, Sunderram J, et al. Rapid increase in hospitalization and mortality rates for severe sepsis in the United States: a trend analysis from 1993 to 2003. Crit Care Med,2007,35: 1244-1250.
  • 8Cid J, Aguinaco R, Sdncheze R, et al. Neutrophil CD64 expression expression as markerof bacterial infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect, 2010,60 : 313-319.
  • 9Jia LQ, Shen YC, Hu Q J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of neutrophil CD64 expression in neonatal infection: a meta-analysis. J Int Med Res,2013,41:934-943.
  • 10Wang X, Li ZY, Zeng L, et al. Neutrophil CD64 expression as a di- agnostic marker for sepsis in adult patients: a meta-analysis. Crit Care, 2015,19 : 245-253.

引证文献8

二级引证文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部