国外二语语用教学研究述评被引量：30

A review of L2 pragmatic instructions abroad

导出

摘要课堂教学是否以及如何对二语学习者语用能力发展发生作用,日益受到外语研究者的关注。研究者们从理论和实证两方面系统探讨了不同教学方式在二语语用习得中的作用,充分论证了二语语用教学的必要性和语用的可教性。本文聚焦语用教学研究的三大基本问题,即语用教学的必要性与可行性、语用教学的主要内容以及语用教学的方式,对1980-2012年国外83项本领域的理论与实证研究进行梳理,在此基础上对未来语用教学研究进行展望,以期对国内二语语用教学有所启示。 Whether and how instruction contributes to L2 learners' pragmatic development has aroused increasing interest among foreign language educators.A large body of literature has,theoretically or empirically,examined the effects of different instructional approaches and demonstrated the necessity of special pragmatic instructions and the teachability of pragmatic features.Focusing on three basic issues concerning pragmatic instructions,namely the necessity and feasibility of instructions,the teaching content and the instructional approach,this article reviews 83 studies conducted abroad during 1980-2012 and then provides some suggestions for the current pragmatic instructions in China.

作者卢加伟

机构地区南京大学河南科技大学

出处《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期206-211,220,共6页 Modern Foreign Languages

基金教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"我国英语学习者语用能力对比研究"(12YJA740040) 江苏高校优势学科建设工程南京大学人文社会科学"985工程"三期改革型项目"当代西方语言学前沿理论研究与应用探索"(NJU985JD05)资助

关键词语用能力语用教学教学方式展望

分类号 H313 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献29

1Alcon-Soler, E. 2007. Fostering EFL learners' awareness of requesting through explicit and implicit consciousness-raising tasks [A]. In M. de Pilar Garcia Mayo (ed.). Investigating Tasks in Formal Language Learning [C]. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters, 221-241.
2Alcon-Soler, E. & A. Martinez-Flor (eds.). 2008. Investigating Pragmatics in Foreign Language Learning, Teaching and Testing [C]. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
3Bachman, L. F. 1990. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4Bardovi-Harlig, L. 2001. Evaluating the empirical evidence: Grounds for instruction in pragmatics [A]. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (eds.). Pragmatics in Language Teaching [ C ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 13-32.
5Barraja-Rohan, A. M. 1997. Teaching conversation and sociocultural norms with conversation analysis [J]. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics (ALAA) 14: 71-88.
6Barraja-Rohan, A. M. 2011. Using conversation analysis in the second language classroom to teach interactional competence [J]. Language Teaching Research 15, 4: 479-507.
7Bouton, L. 1994. Can NNS skill in interpreting implicature in American English be improved through explicit instruction? A pilot study [A]. In L. F. Bouton (ed.). Pragmatics and Language Learning, Volume 5 [C]. Urbana, IL: Division of English as an Interlanguage, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. 88-109.
8Huth, T. & C. Taleghani-Nikazm. 2006. How can insights from conversation analysis be directly applied to teaching L2 pragmatics? [J].Language Teaching Research 10, 1 : 53-79.
9Ishihara, N. & A. Cohen(eds.). 2010. Teaching and Learning Pragmatics: Where Language and Culture Meet [C]. Harlow, UK: Pearson Longman.
10Jeon, Eun-Hee & T. Kaya. 2006. Effects of L2 instruction on interlanguage pragmatic development EA]. In N. John & L. Ortega (eds.). Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching [ C ]. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 165-211.