信访对行政诉讼的影响分析

Analysis of Influence from Petition on Administrative Trials

当前,当事人的信访、上访成为影响法官办案的一个重要因素。法官对可能信访和上访的担忧,导致法院不敢大胆受理案件,进而使行政诉讼法关于受案范围的规定难以落实。在审理时,当事人投诉、信访和上访,是影响法官办案方式、办案重点以及案件结果的重要因素。面对日益严峻和复杂的信访上访问题,在审判工作一线从事具体审判业务的法官普遍有畏难的情绪和牢骚,感受巨大的心理压力。其中,行政诉讼领域似乎是"重灾区"。当前,要消除信访对诉讼的负面影响,就必须正确处理以下关系:一是理顺信访与行政诉讼的关系;二是明确司法的适法性,正确看待司法的能动性;三是强调司法的裁判性;四是保障司法的权威性。

At present, correspondence petition and individual petition by interested parties have become an important factor that influences the judge in hearing cases. The judge＇s concern about such petitions may prevent the court from taking cases, and may obstruct the implementation of stipulations in Administrative Procedure Law concerning the scope of cases. During the hearing, complaints and petitions by the interested parties make the major factor that affects the method, focal point and result of trials. In the face of increasingly severe and complex petition issues, judges engaged in specific trials on the forefront of court of law manifest worries and complaints in a general manner due to the excessive psychological pres- sure. In this regard, the domain of administrative proceedings seems to be the hardest hit area. At present, in order to e- liminate the negative impact of petition on proceedings, it is necessary to correctly handle the following relationships： first, the rectified relationship between correspondence petition and administrative lawsuit; second, the defining of legality of the judicial procedures and the correct view of the initiative of justice ; third, emphasis on referee status of justice; fourth, pro- tection of the authority of justice.