期刊文献+

不同的子宫颈锥切术后对妊娠及分娩结局的影响 被引量:4

Effect on pregnancy and delivery of the cervical cone different resection after operation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同的宫颈锥切术后对妊娠及分娩结局的影响。方法 2007年5月-2010年5月对144例有生育要求的宫颈上皮内瘤变患者,采用了高频电刀(LEEP)及冷刀锥切手术治疗后,观察两组术后妊娠及妊娠结局、分娩方式并进行对比分析。结果两组妊娠率分别94.85%、84.73%。两组间的流产率及分娩方式差异无统计学意义。观察组早产、胎膜早破、羊膜腔感染综合征、低出生体质量儿、剖宫产率、宫颈裂伤、产后出血的发生率与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论不同的宫颈锥切术对患者的生育能力、妊娠结局没有明显影响;但不同的宫颈锥切术的手术方式、深度和手术到妊娠的时间是影响不良妊娠结局的重要因素。 [ Objective ] To investigate the effect of different cervical cone resection operation on the outcome of pregnancy and childbirth. [ Methods ] From 2007 May to 2010 May 144 cases have fertility requirements of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, using high-frequency electric knife (LEEP) and cold knife conization operation after treatment, two groups were observed after pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes were analyzed, the mode of delivery. [ Resluts ] The pregnancy rate were 94.85%, 84.73%.No statistically significant difference between the rate of abortion and childbirth way between the two groups.The observation group premature delivery, premature weight, the rate of cesarean section, laceration of cervix, the rupture of membranes, amniotic infection syndrome, low birth incidence of postpartum hemorrhage rate compared with the control group, no significant difference (P〉 0.05). [ Conclusions ] Cervical cone resection in patients with different fertility, pregnancy did not significantly affect; operation way, but different cervical cone resection operation depth and operation to the pregnancy time is an important factor influeneingthe adverse pregnancy outcomes.
出处 《中国妇幼卫生杂志》 2013年第2期10-11,13,共3页 Chinese Journal of Women and Children Health
关键词 宫颈锥切术 妊娠结局 早产 宫颈上皮内瘤样变 conization pregnancy outcomes preterm cervical intraepithelial neoplasia degeneration
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献50

  • 1Fung KFM, Senterman M, Faught W. Should endocervieal excision and curettage be done during LEEP? Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 1997,18(2) :104.
  • 2Hillemanns P, Kimmig R, Danneeker C, et al. LEEP versus cold knife conization for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias.Zentralbl Gynakol,2000,122( 1 ) :35.
  • 3Boulanger JC, Gondry J, Verhoest P, et al. Treatment of CIN after menopause. Bur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2001,95 (2) : 175.
  • 4John Y,John A,Julius,et al. Cervical cone margins as a predictor for residual dysplasia in postcone hysterectomy specimens. Obstet Gyneco1,1994,84( 1 ) :128.
  • 5Lapaquette TK, Dinh TV, Hannigan E, et al. Management of patients with positive margins after cervical conization. Obstet Gynecol,1993,82(3) :440.
  • 6Ferenczy A, Choukroun D, Falcon T, et al. The effect of cervical loop electrosurgical excision on subsequent pregnancy outcome : North American experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1995,172 (4) : 1246.
  • 7Cruickshank ME, Flannelly G, Campbell DM, et al. Fertility and pregnancy outcome following large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone. Br J Obstet Gynecol, 1995,102 (6) :467.
  • 8Matsuura Y, Kawageo T, Yoki N, et al. Early cervical neoplasia confirmed by conization: diagnostic accuracy of cytology, colposcopy and punch biopsy[J]. Acta Cytol,1996,40:241 - 246.
  • 9Srisomboon J, Tangchaitrong CA, Bhusawang Y, et al.Evaluation of colposcopic accuracy in diagnosis of cervical neoplasia[J]. J Med Assoc Thai, 1996, 79:423 -428.
  • 10Chang DY, Cheng WF, Tomg PL, et al. Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of coninazation specimens[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 1996, 63:53 - 56.

共引文献789

同被引文献38

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部