期刊文献+

腹腔镜与药物对比治疗异位妊娠的疗效观察

The clinical efficacy comparison of ectopic pregnancy between laparoscopic surgery and drug therapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比观察腹腔镜手术及药物保守治疗异位妊娠患者的疗效。方法选取妇产科同期未破裂异位妊娠患者100例,分为腹腔镜保守手术50例(腹腔镜组),药物保守治疗50例(药物组)。比较两组患者住院时间、治愈率、术后β-HCG降至正常时间、包块消失时间、月经恢复时间。结果行腹腔镜组住院时间为(6±3)d,治愈率为100%,术后β-HCG降至正常时间为(16.5±7.5)d,包块消失时间为(13.8±7.1)d,月经恢复时间为术后1个月;药物组分别为(13±5)d、84%、(18.8±7.5)d、(21.2±6.5)d和(2±1)个月;两组相比,P<0.05。结论对未破裂的异位妊娠患者,腹腔镜手术治疗具有明显的优势,应为其首选治疗方式。 [ Objective ] To observe the efficacy of the treatments between laparoscopic surgery and conservative drug therapy in ectopic pregnancy patients. [ Methods ] 100 patients of unruptured ectopie pregnancy over the same period were chosen and treated, 50 for laparoseopic group and another 50 for conservative drug therapy group.The period of patients stay in hospital, the complete cure rate, the value of 13 -HCG, the Mass lost time and the recovery time period were examined, respectively. [ Resluts ] The laparoscopic surgery group:The period of patients stay in hospital was (6 ~ 3)d, the cure rate was 100%, the time of the β -HCG dropped to the normal was (16.5 ± 7.5)d, the mass disappearance time was (13.8 ± 7.1) d, the recovery time of the menstrual was 1 month; while for the drug therapy group were (13 ± 5)d,84%, (18.8 ± 7.5)d, (21.2 ± 6.5)d and (2 ± 1)rnonths, respectively(P 〈0,05). [ Conclusions ] The laparoscopic surgery has obvious advantages for patients with unruptured ectopic pregnancy and should be preferred for treatment.
作者 朱绍菊
出处 《中国妇幼卫生杂志》 2013年第2期12-13,共2页 Chinese Journal of Women and Children Health
关键词 异位妊娠 腹腔镜手术 药物治疗 ectopic pregnancy laparoscopic surgery drug treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献32

  • 1谷香珍,郭家彬,汪桂兰.腹腔镜在异位妊娠手术中的应用[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2006,22(2):156-156. 被引量:15
  • 2宋华东,陈士岭,何锦霞,裘毓雯.氨甲喋呤联合米非司酮治疗异位妊娠的Meta分析[J].南方医科大学学报,2006,26(12):1815-1817. 被引量:36
  • 3王海英,闻安民,姚书忠,洪淡华.输卵管妊娠手术治疗后再次妊娠的时机探讨[J].南方医科大学学报,2007,27(1):104-106. 被引量:31
  • 4郑怀美.现代妇产科学[M].上海:上海医科大学出版社,2000,101.
  • 5Yao M, Tulandi T. Current status of surgical and nonsurgical man- agement of ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril, 1997,67 ( 3 ) :421-433.
  • 6Maiman M. Laparoscopic removal of the adnexal mass : the case for caution. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 1995,38 (2) :370-379.
  • 7Verhulst G,Devroey P. Endoscopic surgery in gynecologic practice. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 1995,49 (2) : 107-123.
  • 8Maruri F, Azziz R. Laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancies: technology assessment and public health implications. Fertil Steril, 1993,59(3) :487-498.
  • 9Chapron C, Querleu D, Mage G, et al. Complications of gynecologic laparoscopy. Muhicentric study of 7,604 laparoscopies. J Gy- necol Obstet Biol Reprod ( Paris), 1992,21 ( 2 ) : 207 -213.
  • 10Vassilidon N, Balmer J. Characterization of tubal and decidual leukocyte populations in ectopic pregnancy: evidance that endometrial granulated lymphocytes are absent from the tubal implantation site.Fertil Steril, 1998,69 (4) :760.

共引文献745

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部