期刊文献+

概化理论方差分量置信区间估计方法的比较 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 概化理论又称为方差分量模型,其方差分量估计受限于抽样,不同的抽样样本估计的方差分量可能不一样。为了降低估计的误差,应该重视考察方差分量的变异量(如置信区间)。Bootstrap方法是一种有放回的再抽样方法,可用于估计概化理论的方差分量置信区间。文章采用蒙特卡洛模拟技术,比较Bootstrap的PC和BCa方法估计概化理论方差分量置信区间的性能。结果发现:(1)与未校正的方法相比,校正的Bootstrap的PC和BCa方法估计概化理论的方差分量置信区间更为可靠;(2)校正的Bootstrap的BCa方法估计概化理论的方差分量置信区间,要优于校正的Bootstrap的PC方法。
出处 《统计与决策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第9期14-17,共4页 Statistics & Decision
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(12YJC190016) 全国教育科学"十二五"规划教育部重点课题(GFA111009) 广东省教育科学"十二五"规划2011年度研究项目(2011TJK161) 广州卓越教育项目
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Gao, X. H.,Brennan, R. L.Variability of Estimated Variance Compo- nents and Related Statistics in a Performance Assessment[J].Applied Measurement in Education, 2001,14(2).
  • 2Efron, B. Bootstrap Method: another Look at the Jackknife[J]. Annals of Statistics, 1979,7(1).
  • 3Fan, X. T. Using Commonly Available Software for Bootstrapping in Both Substantive and Measurement Analyses[J]. Educational and Psy- chological Measurement, 2003,63 (1).
  • 4Efron, B. The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and other Resampling Plans [C]. SIAM CBMS-NSF Monograph 38,1982.
  • 5Efron, B.,Tibshrani, R. An Introduction to the Bootstrap[M].New York: Chapman and Hall, 1993.
  • 6黎光明,张敏强.基于概化理论的方差分量变异量估计[J].心理学报,2009,41(9):889-901. 被引量:16

二级参考文献38

  • 1杨志明,张雷.用多元概化理论对普通话的测试[J].心理学报,2002,34(1):50-55. 被引量:21
  • 2American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurementin Education (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
  • 3American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing (Rev. ed. ). Washington, DC: Author.
  • 4Brennan, R. L. (1992). Elements of generalizability theory (Rev. ed. ). Iowa City, IA: ACT.
  • 5Brennan, R. L. (2001). Generalizability theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • 6Brennan, R. L. (2006). Unbiased estimates of variance components with bootstrap procedures: Detailed results (CASMA Research Report No 21). Iowa City, IA: Center for Advanced Studies in Measurement and Assessment, University of Iowa. Available from http://www.education. uiowa.edu/casma.
  • 7Brennan, R. L., Harris, D. J., & Hanson, B. A. (1987). The bootstrap and other procedures for examining the variability of estimated variance components in testing contexts (ACT Research Report Series87-7). Iowa City, IA: American College Testing Program.
  • 8Briggs, D. C., & Wilson, M. (2007). Generalizability in item response modeling. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44(2), 131-155.
  • 9Clauser, B. E., Harik, E, & Clyman, S. G. (2000). The generalizability of scores for a performance assessment scored with a computer-automated scoring system. Journal of Educational Measurement, 36(2), 245-262.
  • 10Clauser, B. E., Harik, P., & Margolis, M. J. (2006). A multivariate generalizability analysis of data from a performance assessment of physicaians' clinical skill. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43(3), 173-191.

共引文献15

同被引文献28

  • 1Efron B, Tibshirani R J. An Introduction to The Bootstrap[M]. New York: Chapman & Hall Ltd, 1993.
  • 2Hall P, Horowitz J. A Simple Bootstrap Method for Constructing Non- parametric Confidence Bands for Functions[J]. The Annals of Statis- tics, 2013, 41(4).
  • 3Fay M P, Brittain E H, Proschan M A. Pointwise Confidence Intervals for A Survival Distribution With Small Samples or Heavy Censoring Biostat[J]. Biostatistics, 2013, 14 (4).
  • 4Thail H T, Mentr61 F, Holford N H G. A Comparison of Bootstrap Ap- proaches for Estimating Uncertainty of Parameters In Linear Mixed-effects Models [J]. Pharmaceutical Statistics, 2013, 12(3).
  • 5Romano J P, Shaikh A M. On The Uniform Asymptotic Validity of Subsampling and The Bootstrap[J]. The Annals of Statistics,2012, 40 (6).
  • 6DiCiccio J, Efron B. Bootstrap Confidence Intervals[J]. Statistical Sci- ence, 1996, 11(3).
  • 7Efron, B., & Tibshrani, R. An Introduction to the Bootstrap[M],New York:Chapman and Ha11,1993.
  • 8Wiley E W. Bootstrap Strategies for Variance Component Estimation: Theoretical and Empirical Results[M].Stanford,CA;Stanford Universi- ty,2001.
  • 9Othman A R. Examining Task Sampling Variability in Science Perfor- mance Assessments [M].Santa Barbara;University of California, 1995.
  • 10张娟,孙剑.基于SVM的城市快速路行程时间预测研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2011,11(2):174-179. 被引量:18

引证文献3

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部