期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

初中生对人兽混合胚胎议题的论证能力调查 被引量：3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过问卷调查的方法对初中学生在社会性科学议题中的论证能力进行了调查。结果表明,抽样学校学生的论证能力大多处于低论证能力水平。为此建议:重视科学教育中论证教学;精选论证教学的相关题材;采用多种策略进行论证教学。
作者 施容 范锴 陈志伟
机构地区 杭州师范大学生命与环境科学学院 杭州第二中学
出处 《生物学通报》 2013年第5期46-51,共6页 Bulletin of Biology
关键词 初中生 社会性科学议题 论证能力
分类号 Q954.4 [生物学—动物学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Driver R., Newt on, P., Osborne J.. Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms.Science Education,2000, 84(3):287-312.
  • 2Niaz M., Aguilera D., Maza A. eta/. Arguments, Contradicti- ons, Resistances, and Conceptual Change in Students& Unde- rstanding of Atomic Structure. Science Education, 2002,86(4): 505-525.
  • 3National Research Council. National science education standa- rds. Washington: National Academy Press. 1996: 113.
  • 4中华人民共和国教育部.义务教育生物学课程标准.北京:北京师范大学出版社.2011:2.
  • 5Simonneaux L.. Role-play or debate to promote students' ar- gumentation and justification on an issue in animal transgene- sis. International Journal of Science Education,2001, 23(9): 903-927.
  • 6Bell P., Linn M. C.. Scientific arguments as learning artifa- cts: designing for learning from the web with KIE. Internatio- nal Journal of Science Education,2000, 22(8):797-817.
  • 7谢慈雪.国中生社会性科学议题的论证研究.台湾师范大学,2010.
  • 8蒋笃运,张富莉.人兽混合胚胎实验之伦理思考[J].郑州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）,2009,42(2):9-11. 被引量：2
  • 9Sadler T.D., Zeidler D.L.. The morality of socio-scientific is- sues: Construral and resolution of genetic engineering dilemm- as. Science education, 2003,88:4-27.
  • 10约翰.哈里斯.复制、基因与不朽——基因革命的反思.蔡甫昌.张志宁等译.台北,1998.

二级参考文献16

  • 1中华人民共和国教育部.义务教育生物学课程标准.北京:北京师范大学出版社.2011:2.
  • 2Newton P., Driver R., Osborne J.. The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education,1999,21(5):553-576.
  • 3Duschl R., Ellenbogan K., Erduran S.. Promoting argumenta- tion in middle school science classrooms: A Project SEPIA e- valuation. A paper presented at the 1999 Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston.
  • 4Cavagnetto A. R.. Argument to foster scientific literacy: A re- view of argument interventions in K-12 science contexts. Re- view of Educational Research,2010,80(3):336-371.
  • 5Sampson V., Grooms J.. Science as Argument-Driven Inquiry: The impact on students' conceptions of NOS. Paper presented at the 2008 Annual International Conference of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST). Balt- imore, MD.
  • 6Sampson V., Gleim L.. Argument-Driven Inquiry to promote the understanding of important concepts &practices in biology. The American biology teacher, 2009, 71(8): 465-472.
  • 7Sampson V., Grooms J., Enderle P.. New instruments that can be used by researchers to assess three different aspects of sc- ience proficiency. Paper presented at the 2011 Fall Conferen- ce for the Society for Research on Educational Effective- (SREE). Washington, DC.
  • 8Enderle P., Grooms J., Sampson V.. The importance of using multiple measures to assess science proficiency. Paper presen- ted at the 2011 Annual Conference of the Association of Sci- ence Teacher Educators (ASTE). Clearwater, FL.
  • 9Liang L., Chen X., Chen S. et al. Student Understanding of Science and Scientific Inquiry (SUSSI): Revision and Further Validation of an Assessment Instrument. Paper presented at the 2006 AnnualConference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), San Francisco, CA.
  • 10Enderle P., Walker J., Dorgan C. et al. Assessment of Scie- ntific Argumentation in the Classroom: An Observation Proto- col. Paper presented at the 2010 International Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST).

共引文献36

同被引文献28

  • 1楚江亭.科学知识观与教师创新能力养成——社会建构论视野中的科学知识性质解析及启示[J].教师教育研究,2006,18(6):53-57. 被引量：7
  • 2马述忠.欧盟对转基因产品的管理措施[J].世界农业,2004(11):45-47. 被引量：6
  • 3Newton P., Driver R., Osborne J.. The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Sc- ience Education. 1999,21 (5):553-576.
  • 4中华人民共和国教育部.义务教育初中科学课程标准.(2011年版).北京:北京师范大学出版社,2011:1-7.
  • 5Kuhn D.. Science as argument: implication for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education. 1993, 77(3): 319-337.
  • 6Hofer B. K., Pintrich P. R.. The development of epistemolog- ical theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 1997,67 (1):88- 140.
  • 7吴玫湘.科学知识观与学生社会性科学议题论证之相关性.台湾国立交通大学教育研究所硕士学位论文,2008.
  • 8Mason L., Scirica F., Prediction of students' argumentation skills about controversial topics by epistemological understand- ing. Learning and Instruction,2006,16(5):492-509.
  • 9Zeilder D. L., Walker K. A., Ackett W. A. et al. Tangled up in views:Beliefs in the nature of science and response to soc- ioscientific dilemmas.Science Education,2002,86(3):343-367.
  • 10Conley A. M., Printrich P. P., Vekiri I. et al. Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Conte- mporary Educational Psychology,2004,29(2):186-204.

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

生物学通报
2013年 第5期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部