《碧琳琅丛书》本《金氏尚书注》十二卷伪作补考

Some Supplementary Comments on the Counterfeit Jin Luxiang's Notes on Shang Shuin “ Green Beautiful Jades Collection ”

金履祥为宋季元初之大学者,其学师事王柏,为朱熹嫡脉四传。其经学、史学、考证之学皆有极深造诣。金氏经学以《尚书》为大宗,其《资治通鉴前编》即据《尚书》为架构所成之代表性巨著。金氏《尚书》学说之专著,传于今者盖有二焉:《尚书注》十二卷,其一也;《尚书表注》二卷,其二也。《尚书表注》一书乃金氏晚岁定说,绝无可疑;至于《尚书注》十二卷,《经义考》引张云章序文,谓此书乃仁山早岁所为章释句解之《尚书》注,晚后掇其要而为《表注》。后之传是篇者,类皆沿此论述。然其说无所凭据,可疑之甚。本人尝著《金履祥〈尚书注〉十二卷考异》一文,以《尚书注》十二卷(据陆心源《十万卷楼丛书本》)对比金氏《尚书表注》、《资治通鉴前编》,以及《仁山集》中论及《尚书》事之文,已经确证金履祥《尚书注》,实乃后之伪作者拼凑掇辑金氏《资治通鉴前编》中所述《尚书》学说而成之伪作,借金氏少作之名以售其欺蒙之计。2011年,台湾有许育龙君据本人研究之启发,并得悉号称金氏《尚书注》十二卷者,尚有方功惠《碧琳琅馆丛书》本之《尚书金氏注》十二卷,而此本与《十万卷楼丛书》本内容差异极大。进而考得《碧琳琅本》亦为伪作,乃据元朝陈师凯《书蔡传旁通》为底本,外加与金氏相关文献材料,前后拼凑为序跋,鱼目以售其欺。许君以所得撰《〈碧琳琅馆丛书〉本〈金氏尚书注〉著者考疑》一文,既刊登矣。其结论谓此书当是清代中叶之后人所伪作。许君所考论,徇可信矣,然其中尚有多项关键材料未能厘清。本论文即进为之补考,并推论伪作嫌疑者之可能。

I have published a paper arguing that the generally known 12 chapters of Jin Luxiang＇s Notes on Shang Shu （based on the edition of ＂One Hundred Thousand Volumes Collection＂） was a counterfeit work before Xu Yulong also published a paper on the counterfeit evidences of another edi- tion （ ＂Green Beautiful Jades Collection＂）. The results of Mr. Xu＇s textual research were surely very convincible, but there are still some points worth reconsidering. This paper attempts to provide some supplementary observations on the available counterfeit evidences and infer who must be the most pos- sible counterfeiter.