关于巨额财产来源不明罪客观要件的反思与重构

Review and Reconstruction of the Objective Element of Crime of Holding a Huge Amount of Property with Unidentified Sources

在巨额财产来源不明罪客观要件的认定上,理论界存在着不作为说、持有说以及混合行为说。这三种学说均存在固有的理论缺陷且难以解决现有问题。将巨额财产来源不明罪视为一种立法推定的犯罪类型,而不像其他犯罪一样具备完整的构成要件内容,并从犯罪的立法推定视角出发,将"说明来源"条款理解为巨额财产来源不明罪的正当化事由,而不是本罪的构成要件行为,或许是解决本罪客观要件认定面临现实司法尴尬的一种尝试性通道。

There are three theories on the judgment of the objective element of crime of holding a huge amount of property with unidentified sources,which are holding theory and mixed behavior theory,but all of the three theories have inherent defects and it is difficult to solve the existing problems;the way to interpret the crime of holding a huge amount of property with unidentified sources as a kind of crime that do not have objective element,and from the respective of legal presumption,＂the source provisions＂ can be interpreted as legitimate reasons,rather than the objective elements of the crime,and it is may be a tentative channel to solve the realistic judicial embarrassment.