期刊文献+

关系类别间接性学习中分类方式的认知特点 被引量:1

The cognitive characteristics of classified manners upon the indirect learning of relational category
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以252名大学生为被试,采用关系复杂性不同的3种关系类别,创设个人关系类别的间接性学习条件和参照性交流关系类别的间接性学习条件,通过分类任务探讨关系类别间接性学习中分类方式特点.结果表明:关系类别间接性学习中限定分类成绩显著优于自由分类;分类方式对学习条件具有显著的影响作用,且因关系类别关系复杂性的不同而具有不同表现,4特征复杂关系类别学习中参照条件的分类成绩显著高于个人条件,6特征复杂关系加二阶同功能简单关系类别学习中,个人条件的限定分类成绩显著高于参照条件,6特征复杂关系加二阶异功能简单关系类别学习中,2条件分类成绩无显著差异. 252 undergraduate students have participated in the current study. The study designed three kinds of ex- perimental materials. The relational complexity is constantly changing. It arranged the condition of indirect relation al category learning relation to individual and the condition of indirect relational category learning relation to referen- tial communication. The study explored the characteristics of classified manners upon the indirect learning of rela- tional category by classification tasks. The results of the study showed that.. The scores under the condition of limit- ed classification were significantly higher than free classification. The classified manners significantly influenced the learning manners, and the influences varied with the different relational complexities. The classified scores under the condition of referential communication were significantly higher than individual condition during the indirect learning of 4 features' complex relation category. The scores of limited classification under the individual condition were sig- nificantly higher than the condition of referential communication during the indirect learning of 6 features' complex relation plus second order same function simple relation category. There was no significant difference between the learning manners during the indirect learning of 6 features' complex relation plus simple relation category with sec- ond-order different function.
出处 《浙江大学学报(理学版)》 CAS CSCD 2013年第3期348-354,共7页 Journal of Zhejiang University(Science Edition)
基金 天津市教育科学"十二五"规划重点课题项目(HE2014)
关键词 分类方式 关系类别 间接性学习 参照性交流 classified manner relational category indirect learning referential communication
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1BLAIR M, HOMA D L. Integrating novel dimensions to eliminate category exceptions: When more is less [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2005,31 (2) : 258-271.
  • 2张恒超,阴国恩.关系类别及其学习机制[J].心理学探新,2011,31(2):138-143. 被引量:7
  • 3GENTNER D, KURTZ K. Relational categories [C]//AHN W K, GOLDSTONE R L, LOVE B C, et al. Categorization inside and outside the Lab. Washing- ton, DC: APA,2005:151-175.
  • 4张恒超,阴国恩.学习方式对关系类别间接性学习的影响[J].心理与行为研究,2010,8(4):257-262. 被引量:17
  • 5DEAK G, BAUER P J. The effects of task compre- hension on preschoolers' and adults' categorization choices[J]. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1995,60(3) :393-427.
  • 6CLARK A. Language, embodiment, and the cognitive niche[J]. Trends in Cognitive 'Sciences, 2006,10 (8) : 370-374.
  • 7BELLER S, BENDER A. The limits of counting: Nu- merical cognition between evolution and culture[J]. Science, 2008,319 (5860) :213-215.
  • 8LUPYAN G. From chair to "Chair": A representa- tional shift account of object labeling effects on memo- ry[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2008,137(2) :348-369.
  • 9WAXMAN S R, BOOTH A E. Seeing pink ele- phants: Fourteen-month-olds interpretations of novel nouns and adjectives[J]. Cognitive Psychology, 2001,43 (3) ,217-242.
  • 10LUPYAN G, RAKISON D H, MCCLELLAND J L. Language is not just for talking: Redundant labels fa- cilitate learning of novel categories[J]. Psychological Science, 2007,18(12) : 1077-1083.

二级参考文献113

  • 1Blair M, Homa D L Integrating novel dimensions to eliminate category exceptions: when more is less, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2005, 31 (2) : 258-271.
  • 2Asmuth J A, Gentner D. Context sensitivity of relational nouns.Proceedings of the Twenty-seventh Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2005:163-168.
  • 3Dixon J A, Bangert A S. On the spontaneous discovery of a mathematical relation during problem solving. Cognitive Science, 2004, 28:433--449.
  • 4Fisher A V, Sloutsky V M. When induction meets memory: Evidence for gradual transition from similarity-based to category- based induction. Child Development, 2005, 76:583-597.
  • 5Gentner D. The development of relational category knowledge. In L Gershkoff-Stowe & D H Rakison, (Eds.) , Building object categories in developmental time. (pp. 245-275) . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 2005.
  • 6Kurtz K J, Boukrina O. Learning relational categories by comparison of paired examples. In L R Gleitman & A K Joshi (Eds.) , Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 2004.
  • 7Goldstone R L, Steyvers M, Rogosky B J. Conceptual interrelatedness and caricatures. Memory and Cognition, 2003, 31:169-180.
  • 8Kloos H, Sloutsky V. Are natural kinds psychologically distinct from nominal kinds? Evidence from learning and development. Proceedings of the meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Chicago. 2004.
  • 9Gentner D, Kurtz K. Relational categories// Ahn W K, Goldstone R L, Love B C, Markman A B, Wolff P W. Categorization inside and outside the lab. Washington, DC: APA. 2005:151-175.
  • 10Kemp C, Tenenbaum J B, Niyogi S, et al. A probabilistic model of theory formation. Cognition, 2010, 114:165-196.

共引文献29

同被引文献58

  • 1Markman A B,Makin V S. Referential communication and category acquisition[J].{H}Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,1998,(04):331-354.
  • 2Minda J P,Ross B H. Learning categories by making predictions:An investigation of indirect category learning[J].{H}MEMORY & COGNITION,2004,(08):1355-1368.
  • 3Iyer L,Minai A A. A neurodynamical model of context-dependent category learning[A].2011.2975-2982.
  • 4Ashby F G,Maddox W T. Human category learning[J].Annu Rev Psycho,2005.149-178.
  • 5Coutinho M V C,Couchman J J,Redford J S. Refining the visual-cortical hypothesis in category learning[J].{H}BRAIN AND COGNITION,2010,(02):88-96.
  • 6Filoteo J V,Maddox W T,Ing A D. Characterizing rule-based category learning deficitsin patients with Parkinson's disease[J].{H}NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA,2007.305-320.
  • 7Rehder B,Ross B H. Abstract coherent categories[J].{H}Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition,2001.1261-1275.
  • 8Yamauchi T,Love B C,Markman A B. Learning nonlinearly separable categories by inference and classification[J].{H}Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition,2002,(03):585-593.
  • 9Yamauchi T,Markman A B. Category learning by inference and classification[J].{H}JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE,1998.124-148.
  • 10Reber P J,Squire L R. Intact learning of artificial grammars and intact category learning by patients with Parkinson's disease[J].{H}Behavioral Neuroscience,1999.235-242.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部