期刊文献+

论劳动教养在中国的法律归宿——以社会危害性与人身危险性为基础的法律分析 被引量:4

Discussing the Suitable Destination for Education through Labor in Chinese Legal System:Based on Legal Analysis of Its Social Hazard and Personal Dangerousness
下载PDF
导出
摘要 社会危害性与人身危险性是对行为人予以处置的法律基础,社会危害性属于行为的范畴,而人身危险性属于行为人的范畴。社会危害性是行为人承担刑事责任的决定因素,而人身危险性是影响法官裁决结果的一个或然因素,与社会危害性相比,其只对量刑发生次要作用。劳动教养以行为人的人身危险性作为对其长时间剥夺人身自由的原因,其法理依据薄弱,法律地位不明。将劳动教养化解到我国现行法律制度中,以非刑罚处罚和保安处分措施予以代替,符合法律发展的逻辑。 The social hazard and personal dangerousness are the legal base on which an actor is judged.Social hazard belongs to the category of behavior,but personal dangerousness belongs to the category of actor.The social hazard is the determining factor for man to undertake the legal responsibility,but the personal dangerousness is a probable factor to affect the result of the trial.Comparing with the social hazard,the personal dangerousness only plays a secondary role to the discretion of punishment.The education through labor deprives a man's personal freedom for a long time in case of personal dangerousness.Its legal theory is not well grounded,and its legal status is unclear.Education through labor shall be assimilated into the current law system of China,which conforms to the logical development of law,namely,replacing the education through labor by depenalization punishment and security measures.
作者 杜雪晶
出处 《西南政法大学学报》 2013年第2期91-95,共5页 Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
基金 上海市教育委员会科研创新项目(12YS179) 上海市教委刑法学重点学科项目(J52103)
关键词 社会危害性 人身危险性 劳动教养 保安处分 social hazard personal dangerousness education through labor security measures
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1洛克.政府论(下)[M].叶启芳、瞿菊农译.北京:商务印书馆,2008:65.
  • 2霍布斯.利维坦[M].黎思复,黎廷弼,译.北京:商务印书馆,2010:92-97.
  • 3刁荣华.现代刑法基本问题[M].台北:汉林出版社,2007:314.
  • 4张明楷.外国刑法纲要[M].北京:清华大学出版社.2009:453.

共引文献10

同被引文献102

引证文献4

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部