期刊文献+

国际财务报告准则的自愿选择与应用——研究梳理与展望 被引量:2

Voluntary Choices and Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards:A Literature Review
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用国际财务报告准则能否给企业带来益处是近几年国际会计的研究热点。强制性使用和自愿选择国际财务报告准则的应用效果是不同的。基于此,本文对现有研究中自愿选择国际财务报告准则的企业特征和应用收益进行研究梳理,旨在考察研究结论中哪一类企业预期会从国际财务报告准则应用中受益,以及是否确实受益。现有研究表明企业因素和国家因素对企业选择会计准则的倾向性产生显著影响,但就应用收益方面并未达成共识。 Whether the worldwide adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) benefits to improving effectiveness and comparability of accounting information across firms from different countries has been a hot topic for these years. This paper reviews voluntary choices and adoption of IFRS. It is found that the international orientation, cross-listed, size, ownership structure and IPO attribute to firms' choices of IFRS. While inconsistent results are found according to economic consequences of IFRS adoption. It should be the interest of standard setters by indicating the type of firms which may prefer to use and benefit from a particular set of accounting standards.
出处 《会计与经济研究》 北大核心 2013年第2期19-28,共10页 Accounting and Economics Research
基金 北京师范大学青年教师人文社科研究基金项目
关键词 国际财务报告准则 自愿选择 企业特征 应用收益 Intematiomd Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) voluntary adoption firm eharae-teristies economic consequences
  • 相关文献

参考文献51

  • 1FASB. Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting Financial Accounting Standards Board[R].2010.
  • 2IASB. Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting International Accounting Standards Board[R].2010.
  • 3Tweedie, D. IFRS in 2011 and beyond[A].2010.
  • 4SEC. Roadmap for the Potential Use of Financial State-ments Prepared in Accordance with International Finan-cial Reporting Standards by US Issuers[R].Washing-ton DCSecurities and Exchange Commission,2008.
  • 5Jamal, K,Colson,R.H,Bloomfield,R.J,Christens-en,T.E,Moehrle,S.R,Ohlson,J,Penman,S.H, Previts,G.J, Stober,T.L,Sunder,S,Watts,R. A research based perspective on SEC s proposed rule on Roadmap for Potential Use of Financial Statements Pre-pared in Accordance with International Financial Re-porting Standards (IFRS) by U.S.Issuers[J].Ac-counting Horizons,2010,(01):139-147.
  • 6SEC. Work Plan for the Consideration of Incorporating International Financial Reporting Standards into the Fi-nancial Reporting System for U.S.IssuersA Compari-son of U.S.GAAP and IFRS[R].Securities and Ex-change Commission,2011.
  • 7Durocher, S,Gendron,Y. IFRS On the docility of sophisticated users in preserving the ideal of compara-bility[J].European Accounting Review,2011,(02):233-262.
  • 8Wu, J.S,Zhang, I.X. Accounting Integration and ComparabilityEvidence from Relative Performance E-valuation Around IFRS Adoption .Simon School Working Paper No.FR10-25[R].2010.
  • 9Barth, M.E,Landsman, W.R,Lang, M.H,Wil-liams,C.D. Are International Accounting Standards-Based and US GAAP-Based Accounting Amounts Com-parable?.Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Working Paper No.78[R].2011.
  • 10Brochet, F,Jagolinzer, A.D,Riedl, E. Mandatory IFRS Adoption and Financial Statement Comparability .Harvard Business School Working Paper No.1819482[R].2011.

同被引文献23

  • 1Ang, J., R. Cole, and J. Lin. 2000. Agency Gosts and Ownership Structure. Journal of Finance, 55 (1): 81 -106.
  • 2Ashbaugh, H. 2001. Non - US Firms' Accounting Stand- ard Choices. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 20 (2): 129-153.
  • 3Ball, R., S. P. Kothari, and A. Robin. 2000. The Effect of International Institutional Factors on Properties of Ac- counting Earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29 (1).1 -51.
  • 4Bassemir, M. 2011. Why Do Private Finns Adopt IF- RS?. Working Paper. Available at SSRN: http: //ssm. corn/ abstract = 1896283.
  • 5Coppens, L., and E. Peek. 2005. An Analysis of Earnings Management by European Private Firms. Journal of In- ternational Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 14 (1): 1 - 17.
  • 6Cuijpers, R., and W. Buijink. 2005. Voluntary Adop- tion of Non - Local GAAP in the European Union: A Study of Determinants and Consequences. European Accounting Review, 14 (3): 487-524.
  • 7Drake, M. S., L. A. Myers, and L. Yao, 2010. Are Liquidity Improvements around the Mandatory Adoption of IFRS Attributable to Comparability Effects or to Quality EffectsT. Working Paper. In AAA 2010 Financial Accounting and Reporting Section (FARS).
  • 8Baladouni,V.The Accounting Records of the East India Company[J].The Accounting Historians Journal,Spring,1981:67-69.
  • 9McCowen,G.B.The Accountant as An Artist[J].The Accounting Review,1946,21 (2):294-212.
  • 10Skinner,R.M.Accounting Standards in Evolution[M].Toronto:Holt,Rinehart,1987.

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部