期刊文献+

制造业组织冗余、两职兼任与企业绩效——基于中国上市面板数据的实证研究 被引量:4

Organizational Slack of Enterprise in Manufacturing Industry,Duality and Performance——An Empirical Analysis Based on the Panel Data of the Chinese Listed Company
下载PDF
导出
摘要 制造业作为中国的支柱产业,在温州债务危机爆发后,为制造业"输血"的呼声不绝于耳,政府及银行也相继展开救助。然而资源增加后难以避免的组织冗余对企业绩效有何影响?当前国内外对两者关系的研究并不一致。因此,本文以制造业为对象,结合代理理论和管家理论,以管理者两职兼任为情境变量,研究了组织冗余与企业绩效的关系。通过2001~2010年10年的上市公司面板数据对理论假设进行检验,实证结果表明:对于制造业企业而言,在一般情况下,组织冗余对企业绩效有负面影响,支持了代理理论的观点;但是对于管理者两职兼任的企业而言,企业代理效应受到更多约束、组织理论所支持的组织冗余正面效应更加凸显,组织冗余与企业绩效两者之间的负向关系被弱化。本文在增加相关理论研究结论的同时,也对当前制造业"输血"救助行动提供了建议。 As the pillar industry, manufacturing industry needs more resource salvation in China after the debt crisis of Wen Zhou. The goverranent and the Banking are also canting out salvage operation. But the organizational slack will emerge unavoidable after the resource increase and the influence of organizafional alack to the performance is still unknown. Combine with the theory of stewardship and agency, this paper discusses the relationship of organizational slack and performance in manufacturing industry, including the moderating effect of duality. Using the panel data of listed company from 2001 to 2010, we test the hypothesis and find that the organizational slack has negative effect on performance in manufacturing industry, which support the viewpoint of agency theory. But in the enterprise of duality, the agency problem receives more restraint and the positive effect of organizational slack highlights. The negative relationship between organizational slack and performance is weakened. This paper deepens the research of related theory and provides suggestions to salvation of manufacturing industry.
作者 李健 李晏墅
机构地区 南京师范大学
出处 《工业技术经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期83-89,共7页 Journal of Industrial Technological Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"高等教育 校企社会网络和区域技术创新:整体网视角的分析"(批准号:71003047) 国家自然科学基金项目"企业家社会资本 战略过程与企业绩效"(项目编号:71172058)(批准号:10QNPY05)的资助
关键词 组织冗余 两职兼任 企业绩效 organizational slack duality performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1李晓翔,刘春林.冗余资源与企业绩效关系的情境研究——兼谈冗余资源的数量变化[J].南开管理评论,2011,14(3):4-14. 被引量:73
  • 2Tan,J.and Peng,M.W.Organizational Slack and Firm Performance during Economic Transitions:Two Studies From an Emerging Economy[J].Strategic Management Journal,2003,24(13):1249-1263.
  • 3Peng,M.W.and Health,P.S.The Growth of the Firm in Planned Economies in Transition: Institutions,Organizations, and Strategic Choice[J].Academy of Management Review,1996,21(2):492-528.
  • 4Cyert,R.M.and March,J.G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm[M].Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice Hall,1963.
  • 5Moch,M.K.and Pondy,L.R.The Structure of Chaos:Organized Anarchy as A Response Ambiguity[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1977,22(2):350-365.
  • 6Cheng,J.L.C.and Kesner,I.F.Organizational Slack and Response to Environmental Shifts:The Impact of Resource Allocation Patterns[J].Journal of Management,1997,23(1):1-17.
  • 7Thompson,J.D.Organizations in Action[M].New York,McGraw-Hill,1967.
  • 8Bourgeois,L.J.On the Measurement of Organizational Slack[J].Academy of Management Review,1981,6(1):29-39.
  • 9Leibenstein,H.Organizational or Frictional Equilibria,X-efficiency and theRate of Innovation[J].Quarterly Journal of Economies,1969,83(4):600-623.
  • 10George,G.Slack Resources and the Performance of Privately Held Firms[J].Academy of Management Journal,2005,48(4):661-676.

二级参考文献170

共引文献419

同被引文献42

引证文献4

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部