期刊文献+

跨文化交际视阈下的心理映射认知研究

The Cognitive Research on Psychology Perception from the Transcultural Communication View
下载PDF
导出
摘要 跨文化心理交际感知过程是信息交流者从各自不同的认知感知视角,将同一事物放在不同的网状心理空间体系内对元概念的认知映射。心理空间网络结构上的差异,是造成心理映射感知误读的主要原因。依据跨文化交际心理空间映射理论,培养元概念交际意识,超越异域文化认知模式和心理文化定式屏障,是实现跨文化交流的有效途径。 The course of transcultural psychological communication perception means the communicators lay the same concept in different net psychology space systems for the purpose of the cognizing mapping of metanotion from different cognitive perception views.The differences in the net structure of psychology space is the main reason why the misunderstanding of psychological mapping perception arises.And on the basis of the perceptive theory of transcultural conmmunicative space,it is a quite effective way to achieve successful transcultural communication to transcend the barrier of different cultural cognitive modes and psychological culture schemes and foster the ideology of metanotion communication.
作者 李丽 王成
出处 《山西农业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2013年第4期325-329,共5页 Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University:Social Science Edition
关键词 心理映射 认知属性 元概念交际 文化模式 Psychological perception Cognitive characteristics Metanotion communication Culture mode
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Fauconnier,G.Mental Spaces[M].New York:Bloomsburg Publishing House,2010:76-77.
  • 2L.E.Sarbaugh.Intercultural Communication[M].Stanford:Stanford University Press,2007:35.
  • 3M.Woolf.Communication and Social Change[M].Ames:The Iowa State University Press,2009:55-56.
  • 4Thompson G.Introduction to Grammar[M].Geelong:Deakin University Press,2005:69.
  • 5Esperanca Bielsa.Translation in Global News[M].Shanghai:Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press,2011:77-78.
  • 6McCulloch,Pitts.Culture and Cognitive Perception[M].Iowa:State University Press,2005:113-115.
  • 7Hachten Sapir.Language Essence[M].Cambridge:Gunn&Hain Publishers,2009:154.
  • 8胡文仲.超越文化的障碍[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2002.201.
  • 9张辉,杨波.心理空间与概念整合:理论发展及其应用[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2008,31(1):7-14. 被引量:153

二级参考文献40

  • 1Desagulier,G.Grammatical blending and the conceptualization of complex case of interpretational overlap:the case of want to/ wanna[C] // Ruiz de Mendoza.Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics,2005:22-40.
  • 2Dirven,R.Major strands in cognitive linguistics[C] //F.J.Ruiz de Mendoza & M.S.Pena Cervel.Cognitive linguistics:Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplineary Interaction.Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter,2005:17-18.
  • 3Evans,V.& M.Green.Cognitive Linguistics:An Introduction[M].Edinburg:Edinburg University Press,2006:363-440.
  • 4Fauconnier,G.Mental Spaces[M].Cambridge,Mass:MIT Press/Cambridge:CUP,1985/1994.
  • 5Fauconnier,G.& E.Sweetser.Spaces,Worlds and grammar[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1996.
  • 6Fauconnier,G.& M.Turner.Conceptual Integration Networks[J].Cognitive Science,1998,22 (2):133-187.
  • 7Fauconnier,G.&M.Turner.The Way We Think[M].New York:Basic Books,2002a.
  • 8Fauconnier,G.& M.Turner.Blending as a central process of grammar[C] // A.Goldberg.Conceptual Structure,Discourse and Language.Stanford,CA:CSLI,2002b:113-130.
  • 9Fauconnier,G.Mapping in Language and Thought[M].Cambridge:CPU,1997.
  • 10Fauconnier,G.Compression and emergent structure[J].Language & Linguistics.2005,6 (4):523-538.

共引文献155

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部