期刊文献+

Is transcranial direct current stimulation a potential method for improving response inhibition? 被引量:2

Is transcranial direct current stimulation a potential method for improving response inhibition?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Inhibitory control of movement in motor learning requires the ability to suppress an inappropriate action, a skill needed to stop a planned or ongoing motor response in response to changes in a variety of environments. This study used a stop-signal task to determine whether transcranial direct-current stimulation over the pre-supplementary motor area alters the reaction time in motor inhibition. Forty healthy subjects were recruited for this study and were randomly assigned to either the transcranial direct-current stimulation condition or a sham-transcranial direct-current stimulation condition. All subjects consecutively performed the stop-signal task before, during, and after the delivery of anodal transcranial direct-current stimulation over the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-transcranial direct-current stimulation phase, transcranial direct-current stimulation phase, and post-transcranial direct-current stimulation phase). Compared to the sham condition, there were significant reductions in the stop-signal processing times during and after transcranial direct-current stimulation, and change times were significantly greater in the transcranial direct-current stimulation condition. There was no significant change in go processing-times during or after transcranial direct-current stimulation in either condition. Anodal transcranial direct-current stimulation was feasibly coupled to an interactive improvement in inhibitory control. This coupling led to a decrease in the stop-signal process time required for the appropriate responses between motor execution and inhibition. However, there was no transcranial direct-current stimulation effect on the no-signal reaction time during the stop-signal task. Transcranial direct-current stimulation can adjust certain behaviors, and it could be a useful clinical intervention for patients who have difficulties with response inhibition. Inhibitory control of movement in motor learning requires the ability to suppress an inappropriate action, a skill needed to stop a planned or ongoing motor response in response to changes in a variety of environments. This study used a stop-signal task to determine whether transcranial direct-current stimulation over the pre-supplementary motor area alters the reaction time in motor inhibition. Forty healthy subjects were recruited for this study and were randomly assigned to either the transcranial direct-current stimulation condition or a sham-transcranial direct-current stimulation condition. All subjects consecutively performed the stop-signal task before, during, and after the delivery of anodal transcranial direct-current stimulation over the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-transcranial direct-current stimulation phase, transcranial direct-current stimulation phase, and post-transcranial direct-current stimulation phase). Compared to the sham condition, there were significant reductions in the stop-signal processing times during and after transcranial direct-current stimulation, and change times were significantly greater in the transcranial direct-current stimulation condition. There was no significant change in go processing-times during or after transcranial direct-current stimulation in either condition. Anodal transcranial direct-current stimulation was feasibly coupled to an interactive improvement in inhibitory control. This coupling led to a decrease in the stop-signal process time required for the appropriate responses between motor execution and inhibition. However, there was no transcranial direct-current stimulation effect on the no-signal reaction time during the stop-signal task. Transcranial direct-current stimulation can adjust certain behaviors, and it could be a useful clinical intervention for patients who have difficulties with response inhibition.
出处 《Neural Regeneration Research》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2013年第11期1048-1054,共7页 中国神经再生研究(英文版)
基金 supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology of Korea of Republic, No. 2012R1A1B4003477
关键词 neural regeneration NEUROREHABILITATION transcranial direct current stimulation pre-supplementarymotor area stop-signal task response inhibition inhibitory control motor learning behavioralmodification grants-supported paper NEUROREGENERATION neural regeneration neurorehabilitation transcranial direct current stimulation pre-supplementarymotor area stop-signal task response inhibition inhibitory control motor learning behavioralmodification grants-supported paper neuroregeneration
  • 相关文献

参考文献48

  • 1Cai W, Oldenkamp CL, Aron AR. A proactive mechanism for selective suppression of response tendencies. J Neurosci. 2011 ;31:5965-5969.
  • 2Claffey MP, Sheldon S, Stinear CM, et al. Having a goal to stop action is associated with advance control of specific motor representations. Neuropsychologia. 2010;48: 541-548.
  • 3Goghari VM, MacDonald AW 3rd. The neural basis of cognitive control: response selection and inhibition. Brain Cogn. 2009;71:72-83.
  • 4Aron AR, Durston S, Eagle DM, et al. Converging evidence for a fronto-basal-ganglia network for inhibitory control of action and cognition. J Neurosci. 2007;27(44): 11860-11864.
  • 5Aron AR, Poldrack RA. Cortical and subcortical contributions to Stop signal response inhibition: role of the subthalamic nucleus. J Neurosci. 2006;26(9):2424-2433.
  • 6Zandbelt BB, Vink M. On the role of the striatum in response inhibition. PLoS One. 2010;5:e13848.
  • 7Li CS, Huang C, Constable RT, et al. Imaging response inhibition in a stop-signal task: neural correlates independent of signal monitoring and post-response processing. J Neurosci. 2006;26:186-192.
  • 8Chao HH, Luo X, Chang JL, et al. Activation of the pre-supplementary motor area but not inferior prefrontal cortex in association with short stop signal reaction time:an intra-subject analysis. BMC Neurosci. 2009; 10:75.
  • 9Chen CY, Muggleton NG, Tzeng O J, et al. Control of prepotent responses by the superior medial frontal cortex. Neuroimage. 2009;44(2):537-545.
  • 10Cai W, George JS, Verbruggen F, et al. The role of the right presupplementary motor area in stopping action: two studies with event-related transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 2012;108:380-389.

同被引文献4

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部