期刊文献+

基于乘性一致性残缺互补判断矩阵的决策方法 被引量:3

Decision Making Method Based on Multiplicative Consistent Incomplete Reciprocal Judgment Matrix
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对于满足乘性一致性的残缺互补判断矩阵的决策问题,提出了一种决策方法。首先把互补判断矩阵的乘性一致性定义进行了简化,得到了互补判断矩阵乘性一致性的另外几种表达形式;进一步得到了在已知n-1个特殊元素的条件下,残缺互补判断矩阵中缺失元素的补全方法;然后给出了残缺互补判断矩阵可接受的条件,以及矩阵的一致性检验及调整方法;基于残缺互补判断矩阵,给出了以下决策步骤:残缺互补判断矩阵的一致性检验及调整过程,补全缺失元素的迭代过程和最优方案择优过程。最后给出了一个实例,通过该实例的计算以及本文方法与已有方法的比较,证明了本文方法是简便和有效的。 A decision making method is proposed to deal with decision making problems with incomplete reciprocal judgment matrix which satisfies multiplicative consistency.Firstly,the definition of multiplicative consistent reciprocal judgment matrix is simplified and several other expressions of the definition are given.Furthermore,a method to compute missing elements of the incomplete judgment matrix from the special known n-1 elements is given.Then the acceptance conditions of incomplete reciprocal judgment matrix and the measurement and adjustment method of the matrix are presented.Then three decision making steps for incomplete reciprocal judgment matrix are given: the measurement and adjustment of the incomplete reciprocal judgment matrix consistency,the iterative process to calculate missing values of the incomplete reciprocal matrix and selection of the best alternative.Finally,a numerical example is given.Through the computation of this example and the comparison between the proposed method and the known method in other papers,it demonstrates that the solution process of the method proposed in this paper is simple and effective.
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期111-117,共7页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 航空基础科学基金资助项目(2010ZG53074) 陕西省自然科学基金资助项目(2010JM9002)
关键词 管理科学 决策理论 迭代法 残缺互补判断矩阵 乘性一致性 management science decision making theory iterative method incomplete reciprocal judgment matrix multiplicative consistency
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1徐泽水.AHP中两类标度的关系研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,1999,19(7):97-101. 被引量:176
  • 2徐泽水.残缺互补判断矩阵[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(6):93-97. 被引量:29
  • 3Xu Z S. Goal programming models for obtaining the priority vector of incomplete fuzzy preference relation[ J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2004, 36(3): 261 -270.
  • 4Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F, Luque M. Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations[ J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 154 (1) : 98-109.
  • 5Herrera-Viedma E, Aloso S, Chiclana F, Herrera F. A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy pref- erence relations[ J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2007, 15 (5) : 863-877.
  • 6Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F, Herrera F , Aloso S. Group decision making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency[ J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part B, 2007, 37 (1) : 176-189.
  • 7Fedrizzi M, Glove S. Incomplete pairwise comparison and consistency optimization [ J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 183( 1 ) : 303-313.
  • 8Lee H S, Chou M T, Fang H H, Tseng W K, Yeh C H. Estimating missing values in incomplete additive fuzzy preference relations[ J]. Apolloni B. et al(Eds. ) KES 2007/WIRN 2007, Part ]I , LNAI 4693, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2007, 4693: 1307-1314.
  • 9Lee H S, Shen P D, Chyr W L. Prioritization of incomplete fuzzy preference relation[ A]. Lovrek I, Howlett R J, Jain L C (Eds.) KES 2008, Part ]l , LNAI 5178, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer - Verlag 2008, 5178 : 974-979.
  • 10Xu Z S, Chen J. Group decision-making procedure based on incomplete reciprocal relations[ J]. Soft Computing-A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications, 2008, 12(6) : 515-521.

二级参考文献49

  • 1王应明.判断矩阵排序方法综述[J].决策与决策支持系统,1995(3):101-114. 被引量:100
  • 2徐泽水.残缺互补判断矩阵[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(6):93-97. 被引量:29
  • 3汪浩,马达.层次分析标度评价与新标度方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,1993,13(5):24-26. 被引量:128
  • 4王应明,傅国伟.关于层次分析法中权的最小平方法的理论证明[J].系统工程理论与实践,1995,15(1):3-8. 被引量:28
  • 5左军.层次分析中判断矩阵的间接给出去[J].系统工程,1989,9(6):56-63.
  • 6Satty T L. The analytic hierarchy process [M]. New York: McGraw - Hill, 1980.
  • 7Stan Lipovetsky, Conklin W Michael. Robust estimation of priorites in the AHP[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002,137:110- 122.
  • 8Stan Lipovetsky. The synthetic hierarchy method:an optimizing approach to obtaining prioriteis in the AHP[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996,93:550-564.
  • 9Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E. Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making model based on fuzzy preference relations[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems ,2001,122:277 - 291.
  • 10Xu Zeshui,Da Qingli. An approach to improving consistency of fuzzy preference matrix[J]. Fuzzy Optimization of Decision Making,2003,2(1) :3 - 12.

共引文献238

同被引文献56

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部