期刊文献+

基于网络治理的公交服务总效益和各主体决策分析 被引量:8

Profits and Participants' Decisions Analysis in Public Transport Service Based on Network Governance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为解决我国公交服务效率与公平难以兼容问题,本文引入网络治理理论假定政府、企业和社会群体三方合作的基础上,从最大化公交服务效益构建公交服务网络治理模型,剖析政府、企业和社会群体努力水平、控制权配置和产出效率对公交服务总效益的影响,并对模型分析结果进行数据模拟。结果表明:公交服务总效益与三方主体的努力水平、控制权和产出效率紧密相关,只有在合理范围内参与方的努力水平、控制权的提高有利于公交服务效益增加,当超出合理范围时会导致总效益的降低;而三方主体产出效率越高,公交服务总效益越大;控制权配置与自身的产出系数、努力水平相关,产出系数、努力水平越高,则其对应的控制权比例就越大。 In China, the efficiency and justice of urban public bus transport service are incompatible. To solve the problem, this paper uses network governance theory to construct a tripartite mathematical model, which em- phasizes the cooperation among governments, enterprises and social groups and can maximize the profit of public bus transport bus service. At the same time, it anatomizes the control rights, effort levels and output levels of the three subjects and their iniluenees on profits of public bus service. The findings show that the profits of publie bus service are closely related with the control rights, effort levels and output levels. The service profits can be im- proved only when the control rights and effort levels are in some ranges. The service profits are bound up with its output levels. If the output level is higher, the service profits will be bigger. The control rights are correlated posi- tively with their output levels and effort levels. All these conclusions are done well by data simulation.
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期213-221,共9页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家社会科学重点项目(12AGL010) 辽宁省社会科学规划基金一般项目(L12BGL007)
关键词 城市发展与管理 公交服务总效益 合作博弈 网络治理 控制权 努力水平 urban development and management public transport service profits cooperative game network governance control rights effort level
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1[美]斯蒂芬·戈德史密斯,威廉·D·埃格斯.网络化治理:公共部门的新形态[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2008.
  • 2John C. Explaining coordination networks in collaborative partnerships[ C ]. West Political Science Association Annual Confer- ence, 2010, (3): 1-34.
  • 3Ann M T, James L P, Theodore K M. Conceptualizing and measuring collaboration[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2009, 19 ( 1 ) : 23-56.
  • 4Tang S Y, Daniel A M. Collaborative governance approached through theory[ R]. 2009, (12) : 1-45.
  • 5Chris A, Alison G. Collaborative governance in theory and practice[ J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theo- ry, 2007, 18(4): 543-571.
  • 6Joop F M K, Bert E. Public-private partnerships in urban infrastructures: reconciling private sector participation and sustain- ability [ J ]. Public Administration Review, 2009 ,69 (2) : 284-295.
  • 7陈振明.公共管理学——一种不同于传统行政学的研究途径[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008,(4):91.
  • 8Michael M. Collaborative public management: assessing what we know and how we know it [ J]. Public Administration Review, 2006, 66(12): 33-43.
  • 9Hart 0 S A, Vishny R W. The proper scope of government: theory and an application to prisons[ J]. Quarterly Journal of Eco- nomics, 1997, 112(4): 1127-1161.
  • 10Besley T, Gbatak M. Government versus private ownership of public goods[ J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2001, 116 (4) : 1343-1372.

二级参考文献35

共引文献120

同被引文献142

引证文献8

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部