摘要
安全保障义务人因为违反自己的安全保障义务向受害人承担的侵权责任,不论称"补充责任"还是称"相应的补充责任",都是部分的赔偿责任。确定该部分的范围应当考虑安全保障义务人的过错和第三人向受害人的赔偿情况两个因素。法官在确定赔偿范围时应当慎用自己的自由裁量权,不应在法定因素之外自由裁量。
The safety-guard duty obligor hears supplementary liability to the victim due to his omission tort. Whether is supplementary liability or corresponding supplementary liability, the safety-guard duty obligor only bears partial compensation. When determining the compensation scope of supplementary liability, the judge should consider the fault of safety-guard duty obligor and the direct tortfeasor's compensation. The judge should exercise his discretion right with caution and couldn't beyond the legal factors.
出处
《沈阳大学学报(社会科学版)》
2013年第2期178-180,共3页
Journal of Shenyang University:Social Science
基金
国家社会科学基金资助项目(09BFX040)
关键词
安全保障义务
赔偿范围
补充责任
自由裁量权
safety-guard duty
compensation scope
supplementary liability
discretion