期刊文献+

不同类型的教师反馈对学生英语写作中语言错误的影响 被引量:3

Effect of Different Types of Teachers' Feedback on Language Errors of Students' English Writing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用实验法探讨不同类型的教师反馈对学生英语写作中语言错误的影响。研究结果表明,直接的书面反馈与面谈会话相结合的反馈方式,对于学生在动词一般过去时和定冠词方面的使用准确率提升有着明显的作用;在介词的使用方面这种作用体现得不是十分明显。研究同时发现,学生们在语言准确性的完善方面并不是按照直线上升的趋势发展的。 Different types of teacher feedback on language errors in the students' English writing are investigated by experiment. The study found a significant effect for the combination of written and conference feedback on accuracy levels in the use of the past simple tense and the definite article in new pieces of writing. The study also discovers that foreign language learners, in the process of acquiring new linguistic forms, may perform them with accuracy on one occasion but fail to do so on other similar occasions.
作者 韩琳 郑越
出处 《沈阳大学学报(社会科学版)》 2013年第2期246-250,共5页 Journal of Shenyang University:Social Science
关键词 不同类型 教师反馈 学生 英语写作 语言错误 different types teachers' feedback student English writing language error
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Truscott J. The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes [J]. Language Learning, 1996, 46:327 -369.
  • 2周雪兰.EFL写作中教师反馈研究[J].语文学刊:外语教育教学,2012(5).
  • 3侯彤,程悦.汉英翻译技巧在英语写作教学中的应用[J].沈阳大学学报,2008,20(5):61-63. 被引量:2
  • 4李竞.中国学生英语写作中教师书面反馈特征与学生反应的案例研究[J].外语界,2011(6):30-39. 被引量:34
  • 5Ferris D R. The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes. A response to Truscott[J]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1999(8):1 - 10.
  • 6Truscott J. The case for "the case for grammar correction in 1.2 writing classes": A response to Ferris[J]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1999,8 : 111 - 122.
  • 7Kepner C G . An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills[J]. Modern Language Journal, 1991,75: 305 - 313.
  • 8Sheppard K. Two feedback types: Do they make a difference? RELC Journal, 1992,23:103 - 110.
  • 9Polio C, Fleck N, Leder N. If only I had more time: ESL learners' changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1998, 7:43 - 68.
  • 10Fathman A, Whalley E. Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing.. Research insights for the classroom, 1990:178 - 190.

二级参考文献59

  • 1杨敬清.提高英语写作评改有效性的反馈机制──实验与分析[J].外语界,1996(3):41-45. 被引量:170
  • 2王俊菊.总体态度、反馈类型和纠错种类——对大学英语教师作文书面反馈的探讨[J].国外外语教学,2006(3):24-30. 被引量:103
  • 3杨苗.中国英语写作课教师反馈和同侪反馈对比研究[J].现代外语,2006,29(3):293-301. 被引量:220
  • 4Ashwell, T. 2000. Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?[J].Journal of Second Language Writing 9: 227-257.
  • 5Chandler, J. 2003. The efficacy of various kind of er ror feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing[J].Journal of Second Language Writing 12. 267-296.
  • 6Doughty, C. &J. Williams. 1998. Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition [C]. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 7Ellis, R. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 8Fathman, A. &E. Whalley. 1990. Teacher response to student writing, Focus on form versus content [A]. In B. Kroll (ed.). Second Language Writing, Research Insights for the Classroom [C]. Cambridge, CUP. 178-190.
  • 9Ferris, D. 1999. The case for grammar correction in L2 Writing classes: A response to Truscott [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 8: 1-11.
  • 10Ferris, D. 2002. Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

共引文献145

同被引文献4

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部