期刊文献+

密集烤房不同装烟方式对比试验研究 被引量:13

Comparative Test for Different Methods of Loading Tobacco Leaves in Bulk Curing Barn
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了选出减工增效的装烟方式,对3种不同的装烟方式进行了对比试验。结果表明:与常规的绑竿装烟方式相比,采用散叶、烟夹装烟方式,烤房装烟容量分别增加了57.89%和18.42%,装烤效率分别提高了63.53%、49.02%,卸烤效率分别提高了77.66%、39.30%,烘烤每千克干烟分别节省了能耗成本0.70、0.28元,烘干100 kg鲜烟叶的用时分别减少了0.83、0.27 h;采用烟夹装烟方式的烤后烟的上等烟比例高,散叶方式烤后烟的外观质量较好。 In order to reduce the labor cost and increase the benefit, we compared three different methods of loading tobacco leaves in bulk curing barn. Compared with the traditional leaf - loading method with pole, using loose - leaf method and tobacco - clip method increased barn loading capacity by 57.89% and 18.42%, respectively, enhanced loading efficiency by 63.53% and 49.02%, respectively, improved unloading efficiency by 77.66% and 39.30%, separately, saved the energy consumption cost of roasting 1 kg dry tobacco leaf by 0.70 and 0.28 yuan, respectively, and reduced the time for drying 100 kg fresh tobacco leaf by 0.83 and 0.27 h separately. The proportion of high - class tobacco leaf roasted with tobacco - clip leaf - loading method was higher, and the appearance quality of tobacco leaf roasted with the loose - leaf method was better.
出处 《江西农业学报》 CAS 2013年第4期147-150,154,共5页 Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi
关键词 密集烤房 烘烤 装烟方式 对比试验 Bulk curing barn Baking Tobacco -loading method Comparative test
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献45

共引文献225

同被引文献148

引证文献13

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部