期刊文献+

Pushover分析中侧向力分布模式对结果的影响 被引量:2

The Influences of Lateral Load Patterns on Result of Pushover Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在框架结构的静力弹塑性分析中,侧向力分布模式对其结果有一定的影响.本文以三种不同高度的钢筋混凝土框架结构为研究对象,采用三种常见的侧向力加载模式进行静力弹塑性分析,对其基底剪力、位移和塑性铰分布进行了对比.结果表明:随着结构高度增加,结构的高阶振型对性能点位移影响加大,且倒三角分布模式下塑性铰开展要快于其它两种分布力模式. The lateral load patterns have some influences on the results of Pushover analysis for frame structures. In this paper, three lateral load patterns were applied to three reinforced concrete frame structures of different height. The results, including base shear, displacement and plastic hinges distribution, were com- pared. It is demonstrated that the influences of higher modes on the displacement increases with the structural height and plastic hinges develop more quickly under the inverted triangular distribution mode.
作者 席攀 沈之容
出处 《佳木斯大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 2013年第2期214-217,共4页 Journal of Jiamusi University:Natural Science Edition
关键词 框架结构 侧向力 静力弹塑性 塑性铰 frame structures lateral load pushover plastic hinge
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1ATC -40. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings [ R]. Applied Technology Council, Red Wood City, California, 1996. FEMA -273.
  • 2NEHRP Commentary on the Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings [ R ]. Washington D C. : Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1996.
  • 3Krawinklar H, Seneviratna G D P K. Pros and Cons of a Push- over Analysis of Seismic Performance Evaluation[ J]. Engineering Strctures, 1998, 20 : 452 - 464.
  • 4陆新征,叶列平,缪志伟,等.建筑抗震弹塑性分析--原理、模型与在ABAQUS,MSC.MARC和SAP2000上的实践[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009:18-25.
  • 5侯爽,欧进萍.结构Pushover分析的侧向力分布及高阶振型影响[J].地震工程与工程振动,2004,24(3):89-97. 被引量:112
  • 6熊向阳,戚震华.侧向荷载分布方式对静力弹塑性分析结果的影响[J].建筑科学,2001,17(5):8-13. 被引量:77

二级参考文献24

  • 1方鄂华 钱稼茹 等.弹塑性静力分析与时程分析.第十五届全国高层建筑结构学术交流会论文[M].,1998.38-43.
  • 2Applied Technology Council. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete building[R].Report ATC-40, 1996.
  • 3FEMA273, FEMA274. NEHRP Commentary on the guidelines for the rehabilitation of building[R]. Washington D C: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1996.
  • 4krawinklar H. Pushover analysis: Why, How, and When not to use it[A]. Proceedings of SEAOC 65th Annual Convention[C]. HAWAII:Structural Engineering Association of California, MAUI, 1996.
  • 5Kicher C A. Capacity spectrum Pushover method: Seeing is Believing[A]. Proceedings of SEAOC 65th Annual Convention[C]. HAWAII:Structural Engineering Association of California, MAUI, 1996.
  • 6Chopro A K, Goel R K. Capacity-demand-diagram methods for estimating seismic deformation of inelastic structures: SDF Systems[R]. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report No: PEER-1999/02, University of Califormia at Berkeley, 1999.
  • 7Helmut krawinklar, G D P K. Seneviratna. Pros and Cons of a Pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation[J]. Engineering Structures, 1998, 20:452-464.
  • 8Peter Fajfar. Simple Push-over analysis of building structures[A]. 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering[C]. 1996.
  • 9A S Moghadam. Pushover analysis for asymmetric and set-bace multi-story buildings[A]. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering[C]. 2000.
  • 10Misael Requena. Evaluation of a simplified method for the determination of the nonlinear seismic response of RC frames[A]. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering[C]. 2000.

共引文献164

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部