摘要
中国特保机制是我国入世法律文件确立的,自我国入世之日起对我国产生法律约束力的制度。十多年来,特保措施成为美国、印度、欧盟等 WTO 成员对华实施贸易救济的新手段。中美轮胎特保案在"快速增长"、"重要原因"与因果关系问题上存在激烈争论,最终专家组与上诉机构均作出了完全不利于中国的裁决。中国特保机制即将期满而成为历史,然而中美轮胎特保案中我方未能充分举证的教训却值得我们汲取。中国日后若要在 WTO 争端解决程序中获胜,就必须充分举证以支持自己的主张。中美轮胎特保案我方的败诉,既给我们以教训,更引起我们的反思。
China's Special Safeguard Mechanism is a system which was confirmed by China' s legal document of WTO accession, and binding China from the day when China's accession. For more than ten years, the safeguard measures have become new methods for carrying out trade remedies by the WTO members such as the US, India, EU and so on. "Increasing rapidly", "significant cause" and "causation" are the points at issue in China and US -Tires Case. Finally decisions made by the penal and appellate are neither in the interest of China. China's Special Safeguard Mechanism well end and become history, but China failing to give ample evidence in China and US -Tires Case is worth deriving. If China hopes to won in the WTO dispute settlement procedure in the future, she should establish fully for support her own position. China lost in China and US -Tires Case giving us a lesson and reminding our consideration.
出处
《法学杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第5期88-96,共9页
Law Science Magazine
基金
江苏省法学会法学研究课题"我国适用WTO规则解决国际贸易争端研究"(课题编号:SFH2012B14)的阶段性成果
关键词
中国特保机制
中国入世法律文件
中美轮胎特保案
China's special safeguard mechanism China's legal document of WTO accession China & US tires case