期刊文献+

基于利益相关者视角的评价者权重确定方法 被引量:6

Method for determining the weight of evaluator based on perspective of stakeholder
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对传统群体评价中评价者权重确定方法的局限性,提出一种基于利益相关者视角的评价者权重确定方法。所提方法将自主式评价理念引入到群体评价中,通过评价指标值区分谁是潜在竞争者,谁是潜在合作者;在评价者权重的确定上,充分发挥评价群体的主体地位,带有情感因素的评价者通过提升自身优势、打压竞争对手的方式,争取到更多的发言权,从而得出令大多数人满意的评价者权重。最后,通过一个算例验证了方法的有效性。 For the limitation of the traditional method in determining the weight of evaluator in the group evaluation, a method for determining the weight of evaluator based on perspective of stakeholder perspective is proposed. The concept of self-determination evaluation is adopted into the group evaluation, and evaluation in dexes are used to distinguish who are potential competitors and who are potential partners. In the determination of the weight of evaluator, the dominant position of the evaluation group is given, more voice of evaluators with emotion factors is gotten through improving self advantage and depressing rivals, then the satisfied weight of evaluators for most people is obtained. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method is illustrated by a nu- merical examnle_
出处 《系统工程与电子技术》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期1008-1012,共5页 Systems Engineering and Electronics
基金 国家自然科学基金(71071030)资助课题
关键词 群体评价 利益相关者 自主式评价 group evaluation stakeholder self-determination evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Yue Z L. An extended TOPSIS for determining weights of deci sion makers with interval numbers[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2011, 24(1) :146 - 153.
  • 2Xu J P,Wu Z B. A discrete consensus support model for multiple attribute group decision making[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2011, 24(8):1196-1202.
  • 3Vani eek J, Vrana I, Aly S. Fuzzy aggregation and averaging tor group decision making: a generalization and survey[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2009, 22(1) .. 79 - 84.
  • 4Cook D W, Kress M. Ordinal ranking with intensity of preference[J]. Management Science, 1985, 31(1): 26-32.
  • 5Alfredo A, Jose J M, Manuel S. Consensus building in AHP group decision making: a Bayesian approach [J]. Operations Research, 2010, 58(6): 1755 - 1773.
  • 6Yager R R. Aggregation operators and fuzzy systems modeling[J].FuzzySets and Systems, 1994, 67(2): 129- 145.
  • 7Xu Z S. An automatic approach to reaching consensus in multiple attribute group decision making[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2009, 56(4) : 1369 - 1374.
  • 8Dong Y C, Zhang G Q, Hong W C, et al. Consensus models for AHP group decision making under row geometric mean prioritization method[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2010, 49(3):281 - 289.
  • 9Fan Z P, Liu Y. A method for group decision making based on multi-granularity uncertain linguistic information [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(5): 4000-4008.
  • 10宋光兴,邹平.多属性群决策中决策者权重的确定方法[J].系统工程,2001,19(4):84-89. 被引量:124

二级参考文献56

共引文献312

同被引文献64

引证文献6

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部