期刊文献+

秩和比法用于评价护理本科生客观结构化临床考试成绩 被引量:7

Application of rank sum ratio method in evaluation of graduation OSCE scores for college nursing students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨应用秩和比法评价护理本科生(下称护生)客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)毕业成绩的可行性。方法对某医科大学2008级72名已完成临床毕业实习的护生进行OSCE,对其各站点外科考试成绩应用秩和比法综合分析后进行排序分档。结果护生OSCE原始成绩等级分布为良34人(47.22%)、中38人(52.78%),无优、差等级护生。秩和比法成绩等级分布为优5人(6.94%)、良32人(44.44%)、中31人(43.06%)、差4人(5.56%)。秩和比法综合分析所得护生成绩排序与原始成绩等级排序比较,63人(87.50%)排序有变化,变化幅度在±13之间,其中排序上升31人(43.06%),排序下降32人(44.44%)。结论应用秩和比法对护生OSCE毕业成绩进行综合分析切实可行,可以更加客观、准确、真实呈现护生综合能力所处水平。 Objective To study the feasibility of applying rank sum ratio (RSR) method in evaluation of graduation OSCE scores for college nursing students. Methods A total of 72 nursing undergraduates admitted in 2008 received graduate assessment by OSCE mode. Individual OSCE station scores were sorted and classified by RSR method. Results The distribution of OSCE station scores by traditional simple addition showed 34 (47.22%) fitted into the good ability group, and 38(52.78%) into the medium ability group, with none in the excellent or poor ability group. The distribution of OSCE station scores by RSR revealed that 5 (6.94%) fitted into the excellent ability group, 32 (44.44%) into the good, 31 (43.06%) into the medium, and 4 (5.56%) into the poor ability group. The rankings of 63 students' OSCE scores varies with previous rankings, with the new rankings going up or down 13; 31 (43.06%) students' rankings went up and 32 (44.44%) came down. Conclusion It is feasible to evaluate graduation OSCE scores for college nursing students with the RSR method objectively, accurately, and truly.
出处 《护理学杂志(综合版)》 CSCD 2013年第5期56-58,共3页 Journal of Nursing Science
基金 黑龙江省新世纪高等教育教学改革工程项目
关键词 护理本科生 客观结构化临床考试 毕业成绩 秩和比 nursing undergraduates Objective Structured Clinical Examination graduation scores rank sum ratio
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献60

共引文献246

同被引文献71

  • 1于晓松,孙宝志,时瑾,左天明,张训巍,王威.对医学生临床综合能力评价的初步研究[J].中国高等医学教育,2000(2):9-10. 被引量:31
  • 2田凤调.RSR法中的分档问题[J].中国卫生统计,1993,10(2):26-28. 被引量:135
  • 3徐元洪,吴炜.“秩和比”评价法在高考体育专业术科考试素质成绩评价中的运用[J].杭州师范学院学报(自然科学版),2007,6(2):147-150. 被引量:2
  • 4罗海波,胡靖,王安莉.浅析如何提高OSCE质量[J].中国中医药现代远程教育,2007,5(8):58-59. 被引量:13
  • 5田风调.秩和比法的应用[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2002.
  • 6邹扬.客观结构化临床技能考试(OSCE)中信度的相关研究[D].上海:复旦大学.2009.
  • 7Walters K, Osboru D, Raven P. The development, validity and reliability of a muhimodality objective structured clinical examination in psychiatry [ J ]. Med Educ, 2005, 39 ( 3 ) :292-298.
  • 8Auewarakul C, Downing SM, Jaturatamrong U, et al. Sources of validity evidence for an internal medicine student evaluation system: an evaluative study of assessment methods[ J]. Med Educ, 2005,39 (3) :276-283.
  • 9American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Ob- stetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for perinatal care[ M]. Amer Academy of Pediatrics, 2002.
  • 10Zhang HT, Wang F, Zhang J J, et al. Pre-hospital emergency medical progress in 2015 [J]. Chin J Emerg Med, 2016, 25 (2) : 251-254.

引证文献7

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部