期刊文献+

代理理论、管家理论与公司治理分析框架的重构 被引量:11

下载PDF
导出
摘要 代理理论和管家理论在截然相反的经理人行为假设基础上分别提出了控制和信任两类完全不同的公司治理策略,但理论分析和公司治理实践都表明,单一的控制治理或信任治理并不能有效地解决复杂的公司治理问题。本文借鉴功能导向的组织结构设计思想,提出了功能导向的公司治理分析框架,较好地融合了代理理论和管家理论的对立关系,重新定位了公司治理的目标,为今后的公司治理研究提供了新的思路和方向。
作者 陈伟民
出处 《理论探讨》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期86-90,共5页 Theoretical Investigation
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目"基于家族企业的经理人行为倾向选择及其变动研究"阶段性成果(12YJA630016)
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1张志波.现代管家理论研究述评[J].山东社会科学,2008(11):155-158. 被引量:9
  • 2Jensen, M.C.and Meclding, W.H.Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership [J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, (3) :305 - 360.
  • 3Davis,J. H. Toward a stewardship theory of management [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1997, (22) :20 - 47.
  • 4Dalton, D.R. Meta - analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1998, (19) : 269,290.
  • 5Finkelstein, S.and Mooney, A.Not the usual suspects: How to use board process to make boards better [ J ]. Academy Management Executive, 2003, (17) : 101,113.
  • 6Perrow, C., Ghoshal, S and Moran, P.Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay [ M]. New York: Random House. 1996:226 - 228.
  • 7Hoskisson, R., Hitt, M., Wan, W. Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, (25) :417,456.
  • 8Perrow, C. The Economics of Organization:The Principal - Agent Rdationship [ J ]. Acta Sociologica, 1993, (36) : 277 - 293.
  • 9Kiser, E.Comparing Varieties of Agency Theory in Economics, Political Science, and sociology: An Illustration from State Policy Implementation [ J ]. Sociological Theory, 1999, (17) : 146 - 70.
  • 10Grandori,A.Reframing corporate governance: behavioral assumptions, governance mechanisms, and institutional dynamics[ M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004 : 1,27.

二级参考文献19

  • 1张辉华,凌文辁,方俐洛.代理理论和管家理论:从对立到统一[J].管理现代化,2005,25(2):41-43. 被引量:15
  • 2Wasserman, N.. Stewards, Agents, and the Founder Discount : Executive Compensation in New Ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 2006 (49) :960 -976.
  • 3Lee,P. M. and O'Neill,H. M.. Ownership Structure and R&D Investments of U. S. and Japanese Firms:Agency and Stewardship Perspectives. Academy of Management Journal,2003 (46) :212 - 225.
  • 4Caldwell, C. and Karri, R.. Organizational Governance and Ethical Systems:A Covenantal Approach to Building Trust. Journal of Business Ethics,2005 (58) :249 - 259.
  • 5Tam, O. K.. The Development of Corporate Governance in China. Northampton, MA : Edward Elgar. The University of Northampton, 1999.
  • 6Tian ,J. J. and Lau, C.. Board Composition, Leadership Structure and Performance in Chinese Shareholding Companies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2001 ( 18 ) :245 - 263.
  • 7Donaldson, L.. In Defense of Organization Theory, A Reply to the Critics. Cambridge University Press, 1985.
  • 8Davis, J. H. , Schoorman, D. and Donaldson, L.. Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management. Academy of Management Review, 1997 (22) : 20 - 47.
  • 9Donaldson, L. and Davis, J. H.. Stewardship Theory or Agency theory :CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns. Australian Journal of Management, 1991 ( 16 ) :49 - 64.
  • 10Dalton, D. R. and Kesner,I. F.. Composition and CEO duality in Boards of directors:An International Perspective. Journal of International Business,1987(18) :33 -42.

同被引文献87

引证文献11

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部