期刊文献+

基于双加工理论解释下信念偏差效应的神经机制 被引量:3

Neural Mechanisms of the Belief-bias Effect Based on Dual Process Theories
下载PDF
导出
摘要 信念偏差效应是指人们已有的知识信念对逻辑推理的影响现象。对此,双加工理论认为这是由于信念偏向系统和逻辑分析系统之间的冲突所导致的。近年来,该理论得到来自认知神经科学证据的有力支持:一方面,基于功能磁共振成像(fMRI)、近红外光谱(NIRS)以及重复性经颅磁刺激(rTMS)等技术的研究从不同角度证实右侧前额皮层与信念偏差抑制有关;另一方面,基于脑电(ERP)的研究表明,晚期正成分和晚期负成分可能参与了不同推理类型下信念偏差效应的认知加工。未来的研究可以从工作记忆、不同加工阶段、推理前提本身可信度、实验分析、实验材料生态学效度以及思维训练等方面对信念偏差效应作进一步探索。 The belief bias effect refers to a phenomenon that the performance of participants in a logical reasoning task is influenced by their prior beliefs. As dual process theory as'sumes, this effect is based on the conflict between the belief system and the analytic system. Recent studies from cognitive neuroscience have provided strong evidence for this view. Specifically, on the one hand, neuroimaging studies (in which from varied perceptive) using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have demonstrated that the inhibition of belief-bias is associated with increased activation of the right prefrontal cortex (PFC). On the other hand, studies using event-related potentials (ERPs) have found that some ERP components (e.g., late positive component and late negative component) were associated with the cognitive process of belief-bias effect in different reasoning types. Further studies should be concerned with the following aspects: working memory, different stages of processing, believability of premises, analysis of experiment, ecological validity of the materials, thinkinz training, and so on.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期800-807,共8页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(31200768) 上海师范大学校级重点学科 上海师范大学校级文科科研项目资助
关键词 信念偏差效应 双加工理论 神经机制 右侧前额皮层 Belief-bias effect Dual process theories Neural mechanisms Right lateral prefrontal cortex
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1白学军,臧传丽,王丽红.推理与工作记忆[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(1):16-21. 被引量:19
  • 2罗俊龙,邱江,怀章翠,张庆林.范畴三段论推理中信念偏差效应的ERP研究[J].心理科学,2010,33(2):299-302. 被引量:4
  • 3孙彦,李纾,殷晓莉.决策与推理的双系统——启发式系统和分析系统[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):721-726. 被引量:147
  • 4肖前国,罗乐,余林.推理与决策的双加工理论研究简评[J].心理科学进展,2009,17(2):321-324. 被引量:16
  • 5徐晖,渠春环,于平,尹文娟,于萍.(2009).前额皮层肾上腺素能受体在工作记忆中的作用.心理群学进展,17(6),1220-1227.
  • 6Aron, A. R., & Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Cortical and subcortical contributions to stop signal response inhibition: Role of the subthalamic nucleus. The Journal ofNeuroscience, 26(9), 2424-2433.
  • 7Aron, A. R., Robbins, T. W., & Poldrack, R. A. (2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 170-177.
  • 8Boecker, M., Buecheler, M. M., Schroeter, M. L., & Gauggel S. (2007). Prefrontal brain activation during stop-signal response inhibition: An event-related functional near-infrared spectroscopy study. Behavioural Brain Research, 176(2), 259-266.
  • 9Cai, W. D., & Leung, H. C. (2009). Cortical activity during manual response inhibition guided by color and orientation cues. Brain Research, 1261, 20-28.
  • 10Chikazoe, J., Konishi, S., Asari, T., Jimura, K., & Miyashita, Y. (2007). Activation of right inferior frontal gyrus during response inhibition across response modalities. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(1), 69-80.

二级参考文献100

  • 1崔耀,陈永明.阅读理解中的预期推理[J].心理学报,1996,28(3):238-244. 被引量:32
  • 2Cleeremans, A., & Jimenez, L. (2002). Implicit learning and A graded, dynamical perspective. In: French R M. & Cleeremans, A. (Eds.), Implicit learning and consciousness: An empirical, philosophical and computational consensus in the making (1-40). Hove: Psychology Press.
  • 3Epstein, S., Pacini, R. (1999). dual-process theories from Some basic issues regarding the perspective of cognitive --experiential theory. In Chaiken, S., Trope, Y., (Editors), Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology, Guilford Press, New York, 462-482.
  • 4Evans, J. S. B. T. (1996). Deciding before you think: Relevance and reasoning in the selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 223-240.
  • 5Evans, J. S. B. T. & West, R. F. (2002). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-726.
  • 6Evans, J. S. B. T. (2006). The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 13, 378-395.
  • 7Evans, J. S. B. T. (2007). On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 12, 123-145.
  • 8Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition. Annual Review Psychology, 59, 255-278.
  • 9Frenseh, P. A., Buchner, A., & Lin, J. (1994). Implicit learning of unique and ambiguous serial transition in the presence and absence of a distraction task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 567-584.
  • 10Gigerenzer, O., & Regier, T. (1996). How do we tell an association from a rule: Comment on Sloman. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 23-26.

共引文献171

同被引文献21

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部