期刊文献+

结构化面试预测效度的贡献成分分析 被引量:8

The Contributing Components Analysis on the Predictive Validity of the Structured Interview
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以情境面试和行为面试为主要形式的结构化面试,被广泛证明能够预测员工绩效,但其构念效度一直没被清晰地证明。面试的结构性、应聘者印象管理行为、动机、认知能力和人格特征等成分对结构化面试的预测效度都有积极贡献,这种对结构化面试预测效度贡献成分的分析有助于认清结构化面试的构念效度。未来的研究需关注结构化面试构念是否以人际技能为主,以及人际技能、动机、认知能力各自所占比重。 The structured interview which is mainly composed of the situational interview and the behavioral interview, has been widely verified to be effective in predicting employees' performance, but its construct validity has not been clearly verified. The components of the interview structure, the applicants' impression management behavior, motivation, cognitive ability and psychological merits have positively contributed for the structured interview in predicting performance. The analysis on the components contributing to the predictive validity of the structured interview helps understanding the construct validity of the constructed interview. The future's orientations of the research are necessary to concern about whether interpersonal skill is measured by the structured interview, and to estimate the respective ratio of interpersonal skills, motivation and cognitive abilities in the constructs.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期940-950,共11页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目(11YJA880124)资助
关键词 结构化面试 情境面试 行为面试 预测效度 构念效度 the structured interview the situational interview the behavioral interview predictive validity construct validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献75

  • 1Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  • 2Banki, S., & Latham, G. P. (2010). The criterion-related validities and perceived fairness of the situational interview and the situational judgment test in an Iranian organisation. Applied Psychology, 59(1), 124-142.
  • 3Barrick, M. R., Shaffer, J. A., & DeGrassi, S. W. (2009). What you see may not be what you get: Relationships among self-presentation tactics and ratings of interview and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1394-1411.
  • 4Baum, J. R., Bird, B. J., & Singh, S. (2011). The practical intelligence of entrepreneurs: Antecedents and a link with new venture growth. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 397-425.
  • 5Berry, C. M., Sackett, P. R., & Landers, R. N. (2007). Revisiting interview-cognitive ability relationships: Attending to specific range restriction mechanisms in meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60(4), 837-874.
  • 6Bledow, R., & Frese, M. (2009). A situational judgment test of personal initiative and its relationship to performance. Personnel Psychology, 62, 229-258.
  • 7Caldwell, D. F., & Burger, J. M. (1998). Personality characteristics of job applicants and success in screening interviews. Personnel Psychology, 51, 119-136.
  • 8Campion, M. A., Campion, J. E., & Hudson Jr., E J. (1994). Structured interviewing: A note on incremental validity and alternative question types. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 998-1002.
  • 9Campion, M. A., Palmer, D. K., & Campion, J. E. (1997). A review of structure in the selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 50, 655-702.
  • 10Campion, M. A., Pursell, E. D., & Brown, B. K. (1988). Structured interviewing: Raising the psychometric properties of the employment interview. Personnel Psychology, 41, 25-42.

同被引文献65

引证文献8

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部