期刊文献+

制度环境、集群化发展与创新融资约束——基于中国新材料产业上市公司的实证研究 被引量:3

Institutional Environment, Cluster Development and Financing Constraints of Innovation: An Empirical Research on Chinese New Materials Industry Listed Companies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以中国新材料产业上市公司为样本,实证分析了外部制度环境和内部企业集群化发展行为对企业创新融资约束的影响。研究发现:集群化发展程度越高,企业的创新能力越强,创新融资约束程度越低;在市场化进程低、政府干预程度高、法治环境差的地区,企业的创新融资约束越低,且民营企业的创新融资约束普遍高于国有企业。研究结论为战略性新兴产业自主创新能力的提升及创新融资政策的制定提供了经验依据。 This paper took China's new materials industry as the example empirically studied the relationship between the external institutional environment, internal cluster development behavior and financing constraints of innovation. Main findings and conclusions of this paper are as follows: in areas where the cluster development goes smoothly and efficiently, the companies possess more excellent innovative capability and experience less financing constraints of innovation. The lower market-oriented degree and the higher governmental intervention, there is less financing constraints of innovation; and compared with state-owned companies, the private companies are faced with more financing constraints. This study provides empirical evidence for strategic emerging industries on how to enhance the ability of independent innovation and innovative financing policies.
出处 《证券市场导报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第5期29-34,共6页 Securities Market Herald
关键词 制度环境 集群化发展 创新融资约束 新材料产业 institutional environment, cluster development, financing constraints of innovation, new materials industry
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Almeida H., M. Campello and M. Weishach. The Cash Flow SensitiviW of Cash [J]. Journal of Fii-ance, 2004, 59(4): 1777 - 1804.
  • 2Allen F., J. Qian and M. J. Qian. Law, Finance, and Economic Growth in China [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2(105, 77 (1): 7 - 116.
  • 3Bergemann D. and U. Hege. The Financing of Innovation: Learning and Stopping [J]. The Rand Journal of Economics, 2(XJ5, 36(4): 719-752.
  • 4Bhagat S. and I. Welch. Corporate Research and Development Investment: International Comparisons [J]. Journal of Accounting and Econonfics, 1995, 19(1): 443-470.
  • 5Claessens S., E. Feijen and L. Laeven. Political Connections and Preferential Access to Finance: The Role of Campaign Contributions [J]. Journal of Financial Econonfics, 2008, 88(3): 554-580.
  • 6Demirguc-Kunt A. and V. Maksimovic. Law, Finance, and Fiml Growth [J].Joumal of Finance, 1998, 53(6): 2107-2137.
  • 7Eng L. and M. Shackell. The implications of long term performance plans and institutional ownership for firm's research and development investments [J]. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 2001, 16(2): 117-139.
  • 8Fazzari S. M., R. G. Hubbard and B. C. Peterson. Financing Constrains and Corporate Investment [A]. Brookings Papers on Econonfic Activity, 1988, pp.141-195.
  • 9Harrison, A. E., I. Love and M. S. McMillan. Global Capital Flows and Financing Constraints [J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2004, 75(1): 269-301.
  • 10H e ricour j. and S. Poncet. FDI and Credit Constraints: Firm Level Evidence in China [J]. Economic Systems, 2009, 33(1): 1-21.

二级参考文献173

同被引文献36

  • 1万佳彧,周勤,肖义.数字金融、融资约束与企业创新[J].经济评论,2020,0(1):71-83. 被引量:633
  • 2杨建君,盛锁.股权结构对企业技术创新投入影响的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2007,25(4):787-792. 被引量:85
  • 3刘伟,刘星.高管持股对企业R&D支出的影响研究——来自2002-2004年A股上市公司的经验证据[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,28(10):172-175. 被引量:106
  • 4Adams, R. B. & D. Ferreira. A Theory of Friendly Boards[J]. Journal of Finance, 2007, 62(2): 217:250.
  • 5Baysinger, B.I)., Kosnik, R.D., Turk, T.A: Effects of Board and Ownership Structure on Corporate R&D Strategy [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34(I): 205-214.
  • 6Holmstrom, B: Agency costs and innovation [J]. Journal of Econonfic Behavior and Organization, 1989, 12(3): 305-327.
  • 7Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, WH: Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3(4): 305-360.
  • 8Kamien. M. I. and Schwartz, N. L: Self-Financing of an R&D Project [J]. The American Economic Review, 1978, 68(3): 252-261.
  • 9Kortum, S. and Lerner, J: Assessing the contribution of venture capital to innovation[J]. Rand Journal of Economics, 2000, 31 (4): 674-692.
  • 10Sapra, H., Subramanian, A., Subramanian, K: Corporate Governance and Innovation Theory and Evidence[Z]. Chicago Booth Working Paper No. 08-05, University of Chicago Booth School of Business, 2009.

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部