期刊文献+

《文选》李善注变迁综述 被引量:5

Summary on the Edition Changes of The Anthology by Li Shan's Annotation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《文选》注释经历了一个由一到多、又由多到一的过程。从最初李善注显庆三年(658)的上表之本伊始,就产生了不尽一致的传抄本。李善在讲学过程中的不断修订之本,表现出多样的形态,其最终的所谓绝笔之本,则又是对其不断修订之本的统一。监本《文选》的统一整理、刊刻使抄本时代的众多本子加快消失。监本《文选》与平昌孟氏本合并的秀州本,成为第一个合并的本子,其后的广都本、明州本、赣州本,甚至奎章阁本,均是以合并本的面貌出现,合并的传承过程中,二家之注界限的"渐行渐近渐不分",又开始催生出单注本的出现,尤袤刊刻的李善单注本,又从赣州本中脱离出来而独立。总之,《文选》李善注没有完全相同的两个本子。 The annotation of The Anthology has undergone a process from one edition to a wide range of editions and then to a unification. There emerged numerous transcripts of the annotations on The Anthology since Li Shah's first edition in the third year of Xianqing's administration (year of 658). During giving lectures to students, Li Shan continually revised the original version, thus forming different transcripts and the last one is the unification of the previous revised editions. The unified collection, inscription and publication of the official edition of The Anthology fastened the disappearance of the various transcripts. The Xiuzhou edition which combined the official edition and the Pingchang edition annotated by the five people named Lv Yanji, Liu liang, Zhang Xian, Lv Xiang and Li Zhouhan was the first co-annotated version. Afterwards, the Guangdu edition, Mingzhou edition, Ganzhou edition and the Guizhangge edition have emerged as co-annotated versions. In inheriting of the co-annotated versions, the demarcation line of two different editions gradually disappeared, which hastened the appearance of the single-annotated versions. Li Shan's single-annotated edition, inscribed and published by You Mao, was just separated from the Ganzhou edition. After all, there are no two identical editions of The Anthology by Li Shan's annotation.
作者 王立群
机构地区 河南大学文学院
出处 《河南大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期13-25,共13页 Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"文选版本 注释综合研究"(02BZW023)阶段性成果
关键词 《文选》 李善注 简约 繁富 The Anthology Li Shan's annotation simplicity plentifulness
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1李匡乂.《资暇集》,《丛书集成初编》本,第5页.
  • 2陈振孙.《直斋书录解题》.上海古籍出版社,1987年版,第296页.
  • 3[日本]学者斯博六郎.《对文选各种版本的研究》,载《中外学者文选学论集》,中华书局,2005年,第892-893页.
  • 4范志新.《赣州本与明州本》,《文选版本论稿》,江西人民出版社,2003年,第22页.
  • 5《文选版本注释综合研究》下编之《尤刻本文选增注研究》部分.
  • 6《河南大学学报》(社会科学报),2011年第5期.

共引文献19

同被引文献68

引证文献5

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部