摘要
规划成果技术评价的主观性和模糊性是规划实践中普遍存在的现象,也是规划成果科学性不强、指导性不足和规划失效的重要原因。小城镇规划成果评审缺少相应的评价标准和责任机制,导致小城镇规划失效和被频繁修改。基于此,研究针对小城镇规划决策主体的评价差异性、总体规划中发展目标的不确定性、控制性详细规划中用地指标的利益导向性等特征,要求小城镇规划修编和技术评审必须充分考虑经济发展的梯度演进、土地使用的双重管制、建设主体的价值差异及规划实施的路径依赖等决策因素,明晰规划审查重点,界定规划实施的自由裁量权,提升小城镇规划编制成果的科学性和实施过程的执行力。
Discretionary evaluation is a common phenomenon in urban planning practice, and to a large extent accounts for the irrationality, weak guidance, and invalidity problems of many plans. Small town plans lack evaluation standards and nght-obligation mechanism and usually fall into frequent revisions. The paper studies the difference of decision makers, uncertainty of development visions, regulatory plans' benefit orientation, and suggests small town plan revision and inspection take full consideration of economic development, land institution, builders' value difference, and planning implementation mechanism, clarifies critical issues and discre- tionary power, to improve small town planning rationality and feasibility.
出处
《规划师》
北大核心
2013年第3期64-67,共4页
Planners
基金
宁波大学学科项目(XKL12011)
关键词
小城镇规划
实施反馈
评价机制
Small town planning, Implementation feedback, Evaluation mechanism