期刊文献+

两种内固定方式在股骨转子下长段粉碎性骨折治疗中的应用 被引量:8

Two internal fixation methods in treatment of subtrochanteric low long segment comminuted fractures
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨股骨近端解剖型锁定加压钢板和防旋型股骨近端髓内钉治疗股骨转子下长段粉碎性骨折优缺点和术后疗效。方法 40例股骨转子下长段粉碎性骨折患者按入院时间列序编号,20例(单号)使用股骨近端解剖型锁定加压钢板(LCP组),另20例(双号)使用防旋型股骨近端髓内钉(PFNA组);术后观察两组患者伤口愈合情况、扶杖下床时间、骨折愈合时间及骨不连情况等,分别使用Harris评分和Lyshonlm评分评价髋、膝关节恢复情况。结果全部40例病例12个月内定期随访。两组患者均未发生患肢深静脉栓塞和内固定断裂。LCP组扶杖下床时间短于PFNA组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);骨折愈合时间长于PFNA组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。LCP组术后2周~12个月Harris评分均低于PFNA组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后2~12个月Lyshonlm评分高于PFNA组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论如果没有合并有骨质疏松及股骨髓腔狭窄的患者,建议使用加长型PFNA,术中尽量对骨折端闭合复位并闭合穿钉固定;对于骨折端过于粉碎,病理性骨折以及合并有骨质疏松的患者,建议使用LCP内固定。 Objective To investigate advantages, disadvantages and postoperative outcomes of treating subtrochanteric low long segment comminuted fractures with proximal femur locking compression plate and proximal femoral intramedullary nail antirotation blade. Methods All the 40 patients with subtrochanteric low long segment comminuted fractures selected in accordennce with the admission time and sequent numbers were edited. Twenty patients with single number adopted proximal femur locking compression plate (LCP group ), and 20 patients with double number adopted proximal femoral intramedullary nail antirotation blade (PFNA group). Wound healing, time for patients to get out of bed, fracture healing time, nonunion and so on were observed after operation in the two groups. Harris scores and Lyshonlm scores were used to evaluate recovery of hip and knee. Results Each patient was followed up within 12 months at regular intervals. All patients in the two groups did not have internal fixation fractures and limb deep vein thrombosis. Time for patients of LCP group to get out of bed was shorter than that of PFNA group, but fracture healing time of LCP group was longer than that of PFNA group, comparison of them was statistically significant ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Harris scores of LCP group were all lower than those of PFNA group, but Lyshonlm scores of LCP group were all higher than those of PFNA group from two months to twelve months after operations, comparison of them was statistically significant ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusions It is recommended to use the stretched PFNA for the patients without combination of osteoporosis and femoral canal stenosis. The closed reduction and closed nailed fixation should be adopted on the fracture end as far as possible during operation. LCP internal fixation is recommended for the patients with excessive crushing on the end with fracture, patients with pathological fractures, or patients with osteoporosis.
作者 郭杰坤 章莹
出处 《中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版)》 CAS 2013年第1期31-34,共4页 Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition)
关键词 髋骨折 粉碎性 手术治疗 Hip fractures Comminuted Surgical treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and aeetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty [ J ]. J Bone laint Sur- Am lg6g- 51 (4) - 737-755-.
  • 2林建宁,孙笑非,阮狄克.膝关节lysholms评分等级评价膝关节功能[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2008,23(3):230-231. 被引量:169
  • 3Schatzker J. Supracondylar fractures of the femur[ M ]//Schatzker J, Tile M. The Rationale of Operative Fracture Care. 2nd. Berlin: Pringer-Verlag, 1996 : 387-413.
  • 4Perren SM. Evolusion of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biology internal fixation: Choosing a new balance between stability and biology [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2002, 84(8): 1093-1110.
  • 5姜为民,周峰,史金辉,杨惠林,唐天驷.锁定钢板系统在四肢骨折中的应用[J].中华骨科杂志,2008,28(4):270-273. 被引量:67
  • 6Hasenboehler EA, Agudelo JF, Morgan S J, et al. Treatment of complex proximal femoral fractures with the proximal femur locking compression plate [ J]. Orthopedics, 2007, 30(8): 618-623.
  • 7Brien WW, Wiss DA, Becker V Jr, et al. Subtrochanteric femur fractures: a comparison of the Zickel nail, 95 degrees blade plate, and interlocking nail [ J ]. J Orthop Trauma, 1991, 5 (4) : 458-464.
  • 8Ostrum RF, Mareantonio A, Marburger R. A eritacal analysis of the eccentric starting point for troehanterie intramedullary femoral nailing [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2005, 19(10) : 681-686.
  • 9Kang S, McAndrew MP, Johnson KD. The reconstruction locked nail for complex fractures of the proximal femur [ J ]. J Orthop Trauma, 1995, 9(6) : 453-463.
  • 10俞光荣,于涛,饶志涛,王树青,周家钤,袁锋,王家骐,梅炯,张世民.股骨近端抗旋髓内钉在股骨转子下骨折治疗中的应用[J].中华创伤杂志,2010,26(1):49-53. 被引量:20

二级参考文献34

  • 1肖湘,张铁良.股骨转子下骨折内固定失败原因分析[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(3):187-190. 被引量:73
  • 2俞光荣,王树青,饶志涛,周家钤,袁锋,王欣,张世民,李山珠,程黎明,梅炯,王家骐,朱辉.防旋股骨近端髓内钉治疗不稳定性转子间骨折33例[J].中华创伤杂志,2007,23(2):83-86. 被引量:126
  • 3Stannard JP, Wilson TC, Volgas DA, et al. Fracture stabilization of proximal tibial fractures with the proximal tibial LISS: early experience in Birmingham, Alabama (USA). Injury, 2003, 34 Suppl 1: A 36-42.
  • 4Beaver RJ, Mahomed M, Backstein D, et al. Fresh osteochondral allografts for post-traumatic defects in the knee: a survivorship analysis. J Bone Joint Surg(Br), 1992, 74: 105-110.
  • 5Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, et al. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int, 1994, 15: 349-353.
  • 6Neer CS 2nd. Displaced proximal humeral fractures.Ⅰ. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1970, 52: 1077-1089.
  • 7Ffigg R, Appenzeller A, Chfistensen R, et al. The development of the distal femur Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS). Injury, 2001, 32 Suppl 3: SC24-31.
  • 8Kregor PJ, Hughes JL, Cole PA. Fixation of distal femoral fractures above total knee arthroplasty utilizing the Less Invasive Stabilization System (L.I.S.S.). Injury, 2001, 32 Suppl 3: SC64-75.
  • 9Krieg JC. Proximal tibial fractures: current treatment, results, and problems. Injury, 2003, 34 Suppl 1: A2-10.
  • 10Perren SM. Evolution and rationale of locked internal fixator technology: introductory remarks. Injury, 2001, 32 Suppl 2:B3-9.

共引文献253

同被引文献55

引证文献8

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部