期刊文献+

追问“基因选择” 被引量:2

Questioning “Genic Selectionism”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "基因选择",或"自私基因"假说是解决"自然选择单位"问题的主要进路之一。"自私基因"假说认为,基因是自然选择的最终单位。但批评"基因选择"的"因果扭曲论证"断言,自然选择可以作用在个体、群体等层次,从而造成基因频率的改变,"基因选择"误解了自然选择过程中的因果关系。然而,此论证忽略了由中心法则保证的基因-性状/行为间的因果关系,并不能真正驳倒"基因选择"。 Genic selectionism or the selfish gene hypothesis is a major approach to the units of natural selection in philosophy of biology.The hypothesis argues that gene is the ultimate unit of natural selection.Anti-genic selectionists refute it by 'The Causal Distortion Argument',which claims that selection can work at higher levels and then produce changes at the genic level.It indicates that genic selectionism distorts the causal process of natural selection.However,this argument cannot overturn genic selectionism,since it neglects the causal relationship between genes and trait/behaviours.This relationship is ensured by the Central Dogma.
作者 陈勃杭 王巍
机构地区 清华大学科学
出处 《哲学分析》 2013年第2期147-154,199,共8页 Philosophical Analysis
关键词 自然选择单位 基因选择 因果扭曲论证 中心法则 the units of natural selection genic selectionism The Causal Distortion Argument the Central Dogma
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1李建会.自然选择的单位:个体、群体还是基因?[J].科学文化评论,2009,6(6):19-29. 被引量:9
  • 2Samir Okasha.The “averaging fallacy” and the levels of selection[J].Biology and Philosophy.2004(2)
  • 3Dawkins,R.Replicator selection and the extended phenotype[].Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie.1978
  • 4Reeve,H.K.,Keller,L.,Keller,L.Levels of Selection: Burying the Units-of-Selection Debate and Unearthing the Crucial New Issues[].Levels of Selection in Evolution.1999
  • 5Sinclair J,Brazil D.Teacher Talk[]..1982
  • 6Midgley,M.Gene Juggling[].Philosophy.1979
  • 7Waters,C.K.Tempered Realism about the Forces of Selection[].Philosophy of Science.1991
  • 8R.Dawkins."Replicators and vehicles"[].GenesOrganismsPopulations:Controversies over the Units of Selec-tion.1982
  • 9Charlesworth,Deborah,Willis,John H."The genetics of inbreeding depression"[].Nature Reviews Genetics.2009
  • 10R.Dawkins.TheExtendedPhe-notype[]..1982

二级参考文献1

  • 1(美)乔治·威廉斯(GeorgeC.Williams)著,陈蓉霞.适应与自然选择[M]上海科学技术出版社,2001.

共引文献8

同被引文献22

  • 1Wilson R A.2007. Levels of selection[CYI Matthen M, Stephens C. Philosophy of biology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007:141-162.
  • 2Sterelny K, Kitcher P. The return of the gene[J]. TheJournal of Philosophy, 1988,85(7): 339-361.
  • 3Brandon R. The levels of selection[C]//PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Associa?tion. Philosophy of Science Association, 1982: 315-323.
  • 4Sober E, Wilson D S. A critical review of philosophical work on the units of selection problem[J]. Philosophy of Science, 1994: 534-555.
  • 5Dawkins R. The extended phenotype[M]. Revised edition. Ox?ford: Oxford University Press, 1999,238.
  • 6Brandon R N, Nijhout H F. The Empirical Nonequivalence of Genic and Genotypic Models of Selection: A(Decisive) Refutation of Genic Selectionism and Pluralistic Genic Selectionism[J]. Philosophy of Science, 2006, 73(3): 277-297.
  • 7Strickberger M W. Evolution[M](3rd). Sudbury:Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2000.534-537.
  • 8Sober E, Lewontin R C. Artifact, cause and genic selection[J]. Philosophy of science, 1982: 157-1800.
  • 9Weinberger N. Is There an Empirical Disagreement between Genic and Genotypic Selection Models? A Response to Brandon and Nijhout[J]. Philosophy of Science, 2011, 78(2): 225-237.
  • 10Dawkins, R. The Selfish Gene[M]. 30th anniversary edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部