期刊文献+

白内障超声乳化联合可调节IOL植入术的疗效

Therapeutic effect of phacoemulsification combined with accommodative intraocular lens implantation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对白内障术后植入Tetraflex可调节IOL进行效果和安全性评估。方法:老年性白内障患者60眼,其中30眼行超声乳化手术并植入Tetraflex可调节IOL,对照组30眼植入Akreos Adapt IOL,观察患者术后的裸眼远近视力、调节幅度、术中及术后并发症。结果:术后6mo两组的裸眼远视力、矫正远视力、矫正近视力比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);试验组裸眼近视力(t=2.427,P=0.023)、最佳远视力矫正后近视力(t=8.687,P=0.000)及调节幅度(t=15.158,P=0.000)均优于对照组。结论:Tetraflex可调节IOL与AkreosAdaptIOL相对比有一定调节力,能为患者提供一定视近能力。 AIM: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of phacoemulsification and Tetraflex accommodative intraocular lens (IOL) in providing both enhanced distance visual acuity and near visual acuity. METHODS Thirty patients ( 30 eyes) with agerelated cataract underwent phacoemulsification and were implanted with Tetraflex IOL, while other 30 patients (30 eyes) were implanted with Akreos Adapt IOL. Prospective data collection included both uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA) and uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA) testing, manifest refraction, bestcorrected distance visual acuity ( BCDVA), distance corrected near visual acuity ( DCNVA ), and the amplitude of accommodation. Intraoperative and post operative complications also were reported. RESULTS, Six months after surgery, the uncorrected distance, corrected distance, and corrected near visual acuity had no significant difference between two groups. The UCNVA, DCNVA and the amplitude of accommodation of Tetraflex group were better than Akreos Adapt group (t= 2. 427, 8. 687, 15. 158, P= 0. 023, 0. 000, 0. 000). CONCLUSION : The Tetraflex accommodating IOL is safe and effective. It provides enhanced near vision with good distance vision 6 months after surgery.
出处 《国际眼科杂志》 CAS 2013年第5期937-938,共2页 International Eye Science
关键词 白内障超声乳化 调节 人工晶状体 phacoemulsification accommodation intraocular lens
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献42

  • 1赵云娥,张国亮,王勤美,瞿佳.多焦点人工晶状体植入术后视功能的观察[J].中华眼科杂志,2005,41(4):369-370. 被引量:33
  • 2曹文红,施玉英.可调节人工晶状体的调节能力分析[J].国外医学(眼科学分册),2005,29(3):171-174. 被引量:8
  • 3Steinert RF, Aker BL, Trentacost DJ, et al. A prospective comparative study of the AMO ARRAY zonal-progressive muhifocal silicone intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology, 1999, 106 : 1243-1255.
  • 4Michael K, Nhung X, Achim L, et al. Implantation of a New Accommodative Posterior Chamber Intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2002, 18 : 208-215.
  • 5Aehim L, Stefan H, Nhung accommodation after implantation X, et al. Measurement of of an accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2003, 29 677-685.
  • 6Javitt JC,Steinert RF.Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation:a multinational clinical trial evaluating clinical,functional,and quality-of-life outcomes.Ophthalmology2000;107(11):2040-2048.
  • 7Schmidinger G,Geitzenauer W,Hahsle B,et al.Depth of focus in eyes with diffractive bifocal and refractive multifocal intraocular lenses.J Cataract Refract Surg2006;32(10):1650-1656.
  • 8Stefan P,Birgit L,Georg H.Halo size under distance and near conditions in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses.Br J Ophthalmol2001;85(7):816-821.
  • 9Wallace RB.Refract cataract surgery and multifocal IOLs.Canada:SLACK2001:189-216.
  • 10Wolffsohn JS,Naroo SA,Motwani NK,et al.Subjective and objective Performance of the Lenstec KH-3500“accommodative”intraocular lens.Br J Ophthalmol2006;90(6):693-696.

共引文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部