期刊文献+

腹腔镜直肠癌手术的研究现状 被引量:34

Current status of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过复习近年国际上针对腹腔镜和机器人辅助腹腔镜直肠癌手术的文献报道,特别是中低位直肠癌手术的随机和非对随机对照试验,讨论当前腹腔镜直肠癌手术的研究现状。虽然腹腔镜直肠癌根治术已被证实安全可行,且与传统开腹手术有相同的肿瘤学疗效,但目前为止,关于腹腔镜直肠癌手术的多中心随机对照研究有限。当前,开腹手术仍是直肠癌外科治疗的标准术式。近年来。机器人手术在其他外科领域被成功应用,但在直肠癌手术中正处于探究阶段。 This article discusses the current status of laparoscopic rectal caner resection through reviewing the recently reported randomized and non-randomized international literatures focusing on laparoscopic as well as robotic-assisted laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer, especially on laparoscopic resection for mid and low rectal cancer. Even though laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer is proven to be safe and available, and to possess same efficacy of traditional open operation, so far multi-center randomized controlled trials about this procedure are limited. Open operation is still the standard procedure for rectal cancer. Robotic-assisted operation has been successfully applied in many fields of surgery, but is still in the explorative phase for rectal cancer.
作者 闫宏生 姚南
出处 《中华胃肠外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 2013年第5期498-500,共3页 Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
关键词 直肠肿瘤 腹腔镜 全直肠系膜切除 机器人辅助 Rectal neoplasms Laparoscopic Total mesorectal excision Robotic-assisted
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Lujan J, Valero G, Hemandez Q, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing lapamscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2009,96:982-989.
  • 2Ng SS, Leung KL, Lee JF, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg Oncol, 2008,15 : 2418-2425.
  • 3Ng KH, Ng DC, Cheung HY, et al. Laparescopic resection for rectal cancers: lessons learned from 579 cases. Ann Surg, 2009,249 : 82-86.
  • 4Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre randomized controlled trial. Lancet, 2005,365 : 1718-1726.
  • 5Miyajima N, Fukunaga M, Hasegawa H, et al. Results of a multicenter study of 1,057 cases of rectal cancer treated by laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc, 2009,23 : 113-118.
  • 6Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Listorti C, et al. Laparoscopic vs open resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Colorectal Dis, 2012,14 : 277-296.
  • 7Row D, Weiser MR. An update on laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Cancer Control, 2010,17:16-24.
  • 8Gouvas N, Tsiaoussis J, Pechlivanides G, et al. Quality of surgery for rectal carcinoma: comparison between open and laparoscopic approaches. Am J Surg, 2009,198 : 702-708.
  • 9Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic- assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC trial group. J Clin Oncol, 2007,25 : 3061-3068.
  • 10Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, et al. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2010,97:1638-1645.

同被引文献285

引证文献34

二级引证文献164

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部