期刊文献+

超声与钼靶联合诊断乳腺肿块220例 被引量:20

The value of ultrasound combined molybdenum target radiography in breast disease diagnosis:220 cases analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨超声与钼靶X线对乳腺肿块的联合诊断价值。方法:收集同时行乳腺钼靶X线及超声检查并经手术病理证实的乳腺肿块患者220例。总结其超声声像图和钼靶X线的特点,并与手术病理结果进行对比。结果:220例中良性92例,恶性者128例。两种检查方法联合应用对乳腺恶性肿块诊断敏感性为95.3%,特异性71.7%,阳性预测值82.4%,阴性预测值91.7%,准确性为85.5%。结论:乳腺超声和钼靶X线在乳腺肿块诊断中具有较高的临床价值,联合应用可提高诊断敏感性和阴性预测值。 Aim:To determine the value of ultrasound and mammography combination in breast disease diagnosis. Methods: Two hundred and twenty cases are eouecteo. All patients must have the breast ultrasound and molybdenum target radiography done, and have had pathological diagnosis. Summarized the characteristic of ultrasound and molybdenum target radiography images and compared the results with the pathological diagnosis. Finally, the value of the two radiological methods in breast disease diagnosis was evaluated. Results: In these 220 cases, pathological diagnosis showed 92 benign and 128 malignant lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of ultrasound and mammography combination are 95.3% , 71.7%, 82.4% , 91.7% and 85.5% respec- tively. Conclusion:Ultrasound and molybdenum target radiography have highly clinical values in breast disease diagnosis. Combined usage can increase the sensitivity and positive predictive value.
出处 《暨南大学学报(自然科学与医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期226-230,共5页 Journal of Jinan University(Natural Science & Medicine Edition)
基金 澳门科学技术发展基金项目(002/2012/A)
关键词 乳腺疾病 多普勒超声 钼靶X线 病理诊断 breast disease color Doppler ultrasound molybdenum target radiography patho-logical diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1OKOBIA M N, tors for breast BUNKER C H. Epidemiological risk fac- review [ J ]. Nigerian journal of clinical practice, 2005, 8 ( 1 ) : 35 - 42.
  • 2REBBECK T R, TROXEL A B, WALKER A H, et al. Pairwise combinations of estrogen metabolism genotypes in postmenopausal breast cancer etiology[J]. Cancer Epide- miol Biomarkers Prev, 2007, 16(3): 444-450.
  • 3吴在德 吴肇汉.外科学[M] 第6版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003.358-359.
  • 4MOSS H A, BRITI'ON P D, FLOWER C D, et al. How reliable is modern breast imaging in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions in the symptomatic popula- tion[J]. Clin Radiol,1999, 54(10) : 676 -682.
  • 5COVENEY E C, GERAGHTY J G, O'LAOIDE R, et al. Reasons underlying negative mammography in patients with palpable breast cancer[ J]. Clin Radiol, 1994, 49 (2) :123 - 125.
  • 6PARIKH J R. Breast imaging flow models [ J ]. Journal of the American College of Radiology. JACR, 2004, 1(4) : 265 - 269.
  • 7TAYLOR K J, MCCREADY V R. A clinical evaluation of grey-scale uhrasonography [ J ]. The British journal of radiology, 1976, 49(579) : 244 -252.
  • 8ZONDERLAND H M, COERKAMP E G, HERMANS J, et al. Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography [ J ]. Radiology, 1999, 213 (2) : 413 -226.
  • 9曹长军,陈东风,田丽元,段仰灿,何敬海.超声与钼靶X线对小乳腺癌的诊断价值[J].临床超声医学杂志,2011,13(5):307-310. 被引量:42
  • 10侯新燕,简文豪,矫健,黄其敏,彭雁,焦冰.高频彩色多普勒超声在乳腺癌钼靶X线摄影阴性诊断中的应用价值[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2007,4(3):162-164. 被引量:17

二级参考文献37

共引文献344

同被引文献146

引证文献20

二级引证文献171

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部