摘要
目的:探讨单纯抗凝治疗次大面积肺栓塞的临床疗效。方法:将我院2010年6月到2012年6月收治的次大面积肺栓塞患者30例,随机分为溶栓加抗凝组与单纯抗凝组,溶栓加抗凝组给予尿激酶溶栓及抗凝药物治疗;抗凝组仅给予肝素联合华法林进行抗凝治疗。治疗后比较两组的临床疗效,动脉血气指标(PaO2及PaCO2)变化,进行疗效的对比。结果:单纯抗凝组治疗后的PaO2及PaCO2变化与溶栓加抗凝组相比无明显差异(P>0.05);单纯抗凝组的显效率与总有效率较溶栓加抗凝组相比亦无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论:次大面积肺栓塞单纯抗凝治疗与溶拴加抗凝治疗相比无显著差异,且单纯抗凝治疗较溶拴加抗凝治疗出血风险率小。
Objective: To investigate the pure anticoagulation times the clinical curative effect of large pulmonary embolism.Methods: Our June 2010 to June 2012 of the time were large pulmonary embolism with 30 cases were randomly divided into thrombolysis group and anticoagulation group,thrombolysis were given NiaoJiMei fibrinolytic therapy;Anticoagulation group give heparin joint law shenyang antithrombotic therapies.After treatment compared with two groups of clinical curative effect,arterial blood gas index(PaO2 and PaCO2) change,the efficacy of contrast.Results: After treatment group of anticoagulant PaO2 and PaCO3 is obviously superior to thrombolysis group(P 0.05);Anticoagulation group of significant efficiency and the total effective rate were significantly higher than that of thrombolysis group(P0.05).Conclusion: Time large pulmonary embolism pure anticoagulation and thrombolytic anticoagulant therapy compared with no significant differences,and pure anticoagulation a thrombolytic and anticoagulation bleeding risk rate is minor.
出处
《中国医药导刊》
2013年第3期446-446,448,共2页
Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
关键词
单纯抗凝治疗
次大面积肺栓塞
疗效
Simply Anticoagulation
Large Pulmonary Embolism
Curative Effect